Pacific Standard May-June 2013 Cover

Anti-Semitism Keeps Rising in Europe. Why?

It’s not just because of Israeli military confrontations, even though incidents rise in tandem when it’s active.


The MV Mavi Marmara leaves Antalya for Gaza on May 22. Anti-Semitism is rising in Europe, often in tandem with Israeli military confrontations, though that's not the sole reason. (Wikipedia.org)
1 Flares 1 Flares ×

Anti-Semitic attacks spiked in early 2009, particularly in Europe, just after Israel’s brief but brutal war to punish Hamas and stop the steady drumbeat of missile fire from the Gaza Strip. “Operation Cast Lead” had awkward ripple effects around the world, but particularly in Britain and France, where anti-Semitic incidents apparently multiplied by three or four.

Someone drove a car through the gates of a synagogue in Toulouse and set it on fire, burning the gates; synagogues and Jewish community buildings in Britain and France have been daubed with graffiti. There were problems with arson and even incendiary bombs planted near synagogues. There were shootings in Denmark and desecrated cemeteries in Sweden. Most were acts of vandalism rather than personal violence, but that didn’t ease any minds in the relevant neighborhoods.

“I never thought I would see this hatred again in my lifetime — not in Sweden anyway,” Holocaust survivor Judith Popinski, living in the traditionally tolerant city of Malmo, Sweden, told The Sunday Telegraph in February.

It’s too early to say whether Israel’s clumsy raid on the Mavi Marmara — the Turkish aid ship populated with at least a few anti-Semitic hooligans — will lead to similar grief for ordinary Jews. But it is worth asking why these attacks happen more often in Europe than in the United States.

Popinski says the main difference in Malmo was the influx of Muslim immigrants. She says she’s started to notice resistance in the classroom when schools invite her to talk about her time in Auschwitz. “Muslim schoolchildren often ignore me now when I talk about my experiences in the camps,” she told the Telegraph. “It is because of what their parents tell them about Jews. The hatreds of the Middle East have come to Malmo. Schools in Muslim areas of the city simply won’t invite Holocaust survivors to speak any more.”

These arguments quickly grow political, and Malmo’s Jewish community blames the city’s left-wing mayor not just for lazy police work but also “for saying that what the Jews perceive as naked anti-Semitism is in fact just a sad, but understandable consequence of Israeli policy in the Middle East,” according to the Telegraph.

A report released in April by a university-based group in Tel Aviv, the Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism, agreed that street-level anti-Semitism seems to rise around the world when the Israeli government does something unpopular. A “visibly Jewish” man told the institute’s researchers that “when an Israeli military operation dominates the headline, I am the first to notice it on the streets.”

But the report also argued — without citing much evidence — that the rash of attacks in 2009 was somewhat organized: “The intensity and nature of the wave that began in January 2009 testified to pre-planned mobilization among radicals from the left and among Muslim immigrant communities.”

Hamas leaders also claimed a level of organization. During the Gaza War the Times of London reported, “a hard-line Hamas leader, Mahmoud Zahar, warned that the Islamists would kill Jewish children anywhere in the world,” to avenge Palestinian deaths.

Perhaps. This kind of thing is red meat to pro-Israeli conservatives who want to convince the world that Europe is soft and over-tolerant as well as anti-Semitic, just as the Mavi Marmara raid is red meat to the people who scream that Israel is a threat to world peace. Unfortunately, solid evidence is lacking. Local police can count and report scattered incidents of arson, grave-marking, angry demonstrations and even physical violence, but they rarely mount deep investigations into who organized what.

The best explanation for the difference between European and American incidents of anti-Semitic attacks probably has to do with the history of immigration to the U.S. and Europe. Muslims who move to America can traditionally afford the trans-Atlantic flight. That means they tend to be better off and better educated than the Muslim guest workers, children of guest workers, and poor economic migrants who have shifted for decades to Europe from Turkey, North Africa and the Middle East.

Once they arrive in America, they’re also treated better, as a rule, than in Europe.

For all the noise about “soft” European “tolerance,” the real model for tolerance and integration is still the United States. German-born Turks who don’t look especially Turkish to me have said what a surprise it was to travel to the U.S. and feel accepted as “German,” because of their accents, while Europeans treat them reflexively as “foreign” because of details like their swarthy eyebrows or black hair.

Anti-Semitism certainly has risen in Europe since the turn of the century. But it’s risen alongside Islamophobia. A Pew Survey of Global Attitudes in 2008 saw both attitudes rising alarmingly on the continent.

“The survey found that suspicion of Muslims in Europe was considerably higher than hostility to Jews,” the Guardian reported, “but that the increase in anti-Semitism had taken place much more rapidly.”

  • Rick

    Perhaps a better reason for the rise of so called "anti-semitism" in Europe is that Europe has increased its respect for fundamenal human rights which Israel has all but abandoned.

    It is a profound irony that Germans now respect human rights more than Israelis. Who would have thought there would be such a dramatic role reversal in such a short period of time?

  • marge

    Of course, antisemitism is on the rise because the Israeli Jews keep killing defenselee, unarmed people. Israeli Jews keep committing crimes against humanity on the Palestinians and Jews in the disapora keep defending and protecting Israel. Now, Israeli Jews are no longer limiting their killings to Palestinians. They are injuring and killing peaceful protestors from Europe and the US that protest Israel's apartheid wall. A week ago when the IDF murdered 9 peace activists and severe injured numerous others enroute to Gaza to take humanitarian good, it killed 6 Palestinian divers. Moreover, a young Jewish student from the state of MD lost an eye while protesting Israel's Apartheid Wall the same day the 9 peace activists were killed. Israel labels all its dead victims "terrorist" to justify their killings. Antisemitism will probably increase as long as Jews in the diaspora support Israel's crimes and accept Israel's lies about its victims.

  • pch

    Mr. Moore:

    Thanks very much for your thoughtful article; it's much appreciated, especially given the current climate.

    I wonder if there needs to be more discussion about the difference between "anti-Semitism" and political opposition to the Israeli government. It seems too easy, and too often done, to equate vandalism with racism. Many knowledgeable Jewish and non-Jewish experts, in fact, would say that has been Israel's diplomatic strategy for years, i.e. anti-Israel is anti-Jewish. And in the scientific sense, correlation does not equal causation, or even motivation.

    It's my sincere hope that you'll continue to write about this for Miller-McCune. It's important work! Thanks for your time.

  • Geoff Fridd

    Jews are always very quick to equate anything "anti-Israel" as being "anti-semitic", because "anti-semitic" carries a stigma – nobody wanted to be labelled an anti-semite. Now, because of Israel's appalling treatment of the Palestinians, this policy is backfiring. People who are against Israel's policies who are being told they are anti-semitic now seem to be saying "OK, if you say I'm anti-semitic, then I guess I am. I'm not going to argue.".

  • guest

    Antisemitism as generally used is treating Jews differently than others because of their ethnicity. In that context, treating Israel in a manner radically different than other countries is a very strong indicator of antisemitism.

    It's almost funny when people describe the Palestinians as "unarmed" when thousands of projectiles have been fired at Israel from the Gaza strip. So Israel, in responding to fire on its territory is accused of using disproportionate force. Turkey, in this case doing the accusing, is not one to use proportionate force with the Kurds when they want a state of their own. Russia, another big critic, killed tens of thousands (of Muslims) in Chechnya. But the coverage of Israel is perpetual, and far more hostile. No one in Sweden or elsewhere in Europe would tolerate the kind of attacks that Israel has to absorb, and if this had happened in Serbia, Gaza would be a graveyard.

    I don't know how to make peace between Israel and Palestinians, but I foresee an eventual capitulation by Israel in order to get some positive press, continued attacks, and eventually, grisly warfare to the death. I don't see any signs of hope.

  • Veig

    "In that context, treating Israel in a manner radically different than other countries is a very strong indicator of antisemitism."

    Well, then I guess that letting Israel violate international laws as they like, letting their soldiers act like terrorists/pirates and get away with it (where states like Iran, Iraq or Cuba would be put immediately under pressure) or letting Israel produce its own brand of Apartheid without any international retortion (which South Africa endured until the late 80s), is also a strong indicator of antisemitism on behalf of the international community.

    Or is it ?

  • guest

    Can we remember the fact that most of the people in the region are semitic, including the Palestinians? It's absurd that criticism of Israel is called "antisemitic", but the relentless framing of Palestinians as "terrorists" by Zionists is not.

    The continual derogation of the entire region is also anti-semitic, often virulently so. We hear endlessly that there has "never been peace in the middle east", that the region is a perpetual cesspool of religious bigotry and violence, that the people are so irrational there is no hope of sane negotiation, and on and on. Like all bigoted stereotypes, these can only be maintained by strenuously ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

    Antisemitism dehumanizes all people of the region, and is one more thing standing in the way of peace.

  • Bill

    The amount of negative press towards Israel is disproportionate considering that far greater tragedies committed by other groups have received less attention. Consider the Islamic Arab militia known as the Janjaweed that massacred 200,000 blacks in Sudan and hardly any media attention at all. Consider also the recent evidence implicating the BBC in antisemitic reporting, a study that the BBC actually tried to cover up. 55 muslim nations at the UN focusing on one small, tiny country defending its right of existence is tragic and a reason why the Islamic world is in the trouble it's in.

  • Spain

    antisemitism comes from the Muslim immigrants and their neo Nazi allies.

  • towelhead

    ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION. IT IS ORGANIZED CRIME. Muslims always treat kafirs (non-Muslims) like animals. Being a Christian living in a Muslim country is like being a Jew living in Nazi Germany. Alas, the Muslim mobs now appear in Western Europe. Most of their victims are Jews and Christian clergy. In the UK the clergy is forced to remove their religious collars because Muslim mobs attack them. There are hundreds of sharia mini states in Western Europe. These sharia mini states are no-go areas for kafirs including police, ambulances, and fire trucks. In my opinion this is the slow motion onset of civil war in Europe between Muslims and Europeans.

    The essence of science and Western civilization is having doubts and original ideas. Muslims have neither doubts nor original ideas. They are zombies. When their population is small, they are Meccan Muslims, so they are friendly and they have extremely large families. When their population is close to 50 percent they become Medina Muslims, so they are obsessed with killing their kafir (non-Muslim) neighbors. Having killed all the kafirs, they kill Muslims who are not perfect zombies.

    Muslims killed about 300 million innocent kafirs (non-Muslims) and almost all caliphs (their supreme leaders). Genocide is their way of life because they follow Sunna (the example of an illiterate warlord called Muhammad). Muhammad is called uswa hasana (the model of conduct) and al-insan al-kamil (the perfect man). All outrageous Muslim customs (e.g., terror, lying, beheading, rape, pedophilia, misogyny and illiteracy) originate in the Sunna. Arabs are the most illiterate people in the world because they are the most pure Muslims. There is only one non-violent Islamic sect: Universal Sufism. Ahmadiyyas and Ismailiyahs are somewhat non-violent. Saudi government bars their entrance to Mecca because, in the opinion of Saudi government, they are not violent enough to be true Muslims. The rest (about 98% of all Muslims) are hateful and violent. I believe that Islam will destroy our civilization unless a broad alliance of all kafirs (including agnostics, atheists, and gays) eradicates Islam.

    In Italy, 95% of all rapists are Muslims. Eighty-five percent of all murderers are Muslims… Another telling statistic is that although the Muslims are 12% of France's population, 70 percent of a total of 60,775 prisoners in France are Muslims! All of France's urban suburbs are being roamed by Muslim black African or Arabic gangs… source: http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html