Pacific Standard Debut Cover

10 Things You Didn’t Know Were in the Health Bill

From breast pumping to adoption tax credits, the leviathan known as the U.S. health care bill is loaded with little goodies.

Some random, weird and interesting solutions appear in the recently signed health care bill.

The 2,000-page health care bill that became law last week is packed with major reforms probably well known (in concept if not in detail) by anyone who has channel-surfed through the nightly news over the past year. There’s an individual mandate, a system of exchanges, new government subsidies and a ban on some of the worst practices of the insurance industry.

Let’s say the small print on the big stuff accounts for about 1,500 pages, give or take a ream. What’s in the rest? Some random, weird and interesting solutions to problems you may or may not have known you had, some with dubious connection to health care at best. As a public service, we explain some of them here.

The Idea Lobby lists these provisions without endorsement or critique (although cobbling them all together on a single page does make the aggregate look a little scatterbrained). But, rest assured, someone in the know championed hard for each one: the Center for Science in the Public Interest, National Indian Health Board, the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term C

Idea Lobby

THE IDEA LOBBY
Miller-McCune's Washington correspondent Emily Badger follows the ideas informing, explaining and influencing government, from the local think tank circuit to academic research that shapes D.C. policy from afar.

1. Menu labeling. The legislation mandates that national chains with at least 20 restaurants must post “nutrient content disclosure statements” — in other words, calorie counts right next to the menu offering “Big Mac.” To drive the point home, menus will also have to mention your suggested daily caloric intake. The provision has all kinds of addendums to deal with seasonal specials, salad bars, vending machines and condiments, but the main idea is this: Maybe we’ll eat less garbage if we can’t remain willfully ignorant about how bad it is for us.

2. Swag disclosure. The bill contains key elements of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, a previously bipartisan idea calling for pharmaceutical reps and device manufacturers to disclose all the goodies they give doctors. This includes money, gifts, food, travel, entertainment, grants, just about anything that may constitute a conflict of interest. The “transparency reports” must be submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and will be posted on a publicly searchable Web site.

3. Right to pump. Workplaces will have to provide “reasonable” break time and a private location — other than a bathroom — for breastfeeding mothers to pump breast milk for one year after the birth of a child. Women’s groups have long sought such guarantees, and this one will apply to all workplaces with the exception of employers with less than 50 employees, where the demand might create an “undue hardship.”

4. Postpartum depression. In addressing another priority for women’s groups, the bill singles out the problem of postpartum depression for expanded funding, worker training, public education and research. The National Institute of Mental Health is due to conduct a national longitudinal study of women with postpartum depression, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services must produce a study on the benefits of PPD screening.

5. Tanning tax. Starting July 1 of this year, there will be a new 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning services (in legislative speak, “a service employing any electronic product designed to incorporate [one] or more ultraviolet lamps and intended for the irradiation of an individual by ultraviolet radiation, with wavelengths in air between 200 and 400 nanometers, to induce skin tanning”). Something called “phototherapy” is excluded.

6. Adoption credit. Beginning with your 2010 taxes, the federal adoption credit goes up by $1,000 to $13,170 per child and now becomes refundable. As one happy advocate blogged, “I’m pretty creative in coming up with ways that adoption is good for all concerned, but even I think the connection of the adoption tax credit and health care is tenuous.”

7. Indian health. The bill incorporates aspects of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, a goal of organizations who point out American Indians have the worst health disparities of any minority group in the U.S., particularly dealing with suicide, alcoholism and tuberculosis. The law increases funding and support on tribal lands for behavioral health and substance abuse, health care worker recruitment and facilities construction.

8. Background checks. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is tasked with developing a national system for conducting criminal background checks of prospective health care workers who would deal directly with patients in long-term care facilities or private homes. This is one of a suite of changes aimed at protecting seniors in nursing homes.

9. Abstinence education. The bill restores federal funding for abstinence-only education, the sex-ed technique that urges students to wait until marriage (while eschewing talk of contraceptives). Researchers dispute the effectiveness of the strategy, and it was getting the cold shoulder from the Obama administration. The health reform bill, however, allocates $250 million for such programs over the next five years.

10. Your W-2. Changes are coming to your tax paperwork. Come next January, the W-2 you receive from your employer (if, hopefully, you have one) will include the cost of employer-provided health care you probably have not quantified before. This will become much more relevant in 2018, when people with the so-called high-cost “Cadillac” plans will have to start paying a hefty tax on it.

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

  • Anonymous

    If Obama thinks his Health Care Reform is so wonderful, why is his family and the rest of Congress exempt from the plan? Also, was I sleeping when we suddenly became a Socialist Society? I just hope Wisconsin joins in to appeal the Health Care Reform bill. We need to take a stand to defend our Constitution.

  • emilybadger

    Obama has actually vowed that his family will get coverage from the new health exchanges created in the bill. (See here: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/prez_ll_switch_insurer_fjteVJAn2tqrMfeomuvLIL) Although this is a somewhat amusing promise on his behalf. As Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley has pointed out, that part of the bill doesn’t go into effect until 2014, so Obama must be presuming he’ll be re-elected.

  • Anonymous

    Seriously – $250 million on abstinence education? This is a joke right? $250 million in 5 years on something that has no proof of working and might be why there are actual teenagers that believe they can’t get pregnant the first time (and then surprise get pregnant). Also, why is rooms to breast feed and tax credits for adopting in the healthcare bill. I’m a woman, I get it, pumping in the bathroom is depressing but slamming it into a healthcare bill is not the answer and what does adopting have to do with providing better insurance.

    After reading this, I feel very angry… sorry for the rant. This bill is ridiculous. People hear healthcare reform and think yup, yup, we need that but don’t bother to read what that means for everyone.

    Sigh.

  • jaycosnett

    Breastfeeding has been proven over and over to have substantial health benefits for both the child and the mother. So, promoting nursing promotes health and will reduce health-care costs.

    Adoption might be a stretch, except that it should be obvious to everyone that being in the foster care system is not good for a child’s mental health! So, more adoptions = lower need for mental health services.

    My guess on abstinence education is that this came from some DINOs in Congress. Since it is up to the Obama administration to implement, I wouldn’t expect getting that money out the door to be a top priority.

  • commonsense

    Our local mcdonalds has 50 employees, where in that restaurant are they going to find a private location to pump milk????? probably the bathroom… wonder what the fine is for that?

    • Nate

      Most Mcdonald's have a lower level that is not visible to the customers. Also don't forget that there are at least one office in each store. The law doesn't say that a separate room exclusively for pumping. Look at most businesses, they all have some kind of office or at least a brake room that could be used. (there is something called a door, signs, and a newfangled invention called a lock). This is not that hard of a concept to grasp, is it?

  • steve

    A lot of the crap in the bill is from pro-corporate (and hence anti-socialist) forces. It’s really a great deal for insurance companies, as they can provide the same crappy coverage and now they have a captive audience.

    There are many well-functioning Western-style democracies that have national health care – in fact they ALL do except for us. Such incredibly radical countries as England, Switzerland, and Canada spend far less on healthcare and get a lot more for their money. We spend the most money in the world per capita on health care and still have third-world outcomes on important measures like infant mortality. I don’t think we will see big improvements from this half-hearted bill. But I think the insurance companies will see bigger profits. It’s not socialism we need to fear – it is greedy, self-serving corporate interests who have got our entire congress and our president in thrall. It’s time we woke up and stopped living in the 50s. The commies are not coming to take over. The corporations already have.

    —- Steve

  • Jennifer

    Hey 3/30 if it were socialism there would be NO INSURANCE COMPANIES! Your free market is alive and well and making a bundle. Stop all the fear rhetoric, its BS. Really why are we so put off that a tiny room may need to be constructed to pump breast milk? I am concerned about the way people are only concerned for themselves and what THEY get. I’ll happily pay more if all American children are covered and kept healthy, that just ensures the strength of the country. Let’s join the rest of the world and provide for our fellow citizens. Well said Steve.

  • J-Mo

    I LOVE how there’s actual money for abstinance education–something pushed by RELIGIOUS people–in the bill, yet they are not allowed to offer abortion coverage.

    Can we say either religious bias (anti-constitutional) or obnoxious strongarming by the right wingnuts?

    I already didn’t like this healthcare bill, but this just straight-up pisses me off! Hypocrites!

  • Jeff

    As a health care worker ie NURSE for the past 33 years and with 14 more to go I can assure you that it is time for a change. I see patients every day that have expensive cell phones and no health insurance. I see the hospital losing money on those patients and charging the insured patient a premium cost for minimal care.It is time for Americans to wake up and take notice. We routinly have welfare mothers bringing their pregnant teenagers to the hospital to start the welfare merry-go-round all over again. It is time to limit the amount of time that you can be on welfare and to require some work for social programs or goverment programs so that they have to earn the money so freely given to them by we the tax payers.

  • rjc116

    It made sense to deal with the issue in the broadest way — why is this a problem?

  • anna

    I always laugh when people compare the cost of health care to a cell phone plan.
    In my area you can get a cell phone free with rebates. You also get unlimited text and calling features for around $59.99 a month. If monthly premiums for health care were the same as cell phone or car insurance plans maybe a lot more people would be able to afford healthcare.
    The cost is so high because the government sends free healthcare overseas while americans pay higher costs to foot the bill.
    There is no way health care is worth the $300 and above they expect me to pay for it.

  • Joe

    @anna: “The cost is so high because the government sends free healthcare overseas while americans pay higher costs to foot the bill.” — An interesting assertion. Please show how this is true.

  • MinerSam

    But how many people know that 80% now and 85% in 2014 of premiums will have to got to health care.

    That last year only 77% did and in some places only 67% typically does.

    How many Americans know that in 2014 Small businesses that offer health care will get a 50% tax CREDIT an increase from the 35% this year.

    That 100,000 people die every year from Hospital aquired diseas..which cost $35B
    a year ($350B over 10), or that there are
    a lot of phony providers (device & otherwise)…that these and not in cutting services for Grandma is where a lot of savings lie!

    Not to mention looking at models around the country that work. Such as how the Cleaveland Clinic where Doctors get high-salaries and work in teams Which yield faster, more accurate diagnosis and treatment for 1/2 the cost.

    That some funding goes to clinics.

    Or the incentive for people to get into Primary Care not only because of shortages but because we have an oversupply of expensive specialists.

    Glad to see an effort to improve Native Americans’ health.

    And not one Media outlet (especially such programs as the GOP-POV Newshour) has spoken about the nature of the subsidies
    THAT MEETS THE “QUALITY & **AFFORDABLE** Health care goal for a majority of Americans.

    Tanning booth contribute to preventable skin cancer and providers are lucky to get away with only 10%.

    And informed consumers about what they are putting into their bodies (efforts repeatedly erroded by the Republicans) creats the best customers.

  • New Complaint

    All public hospitals will become VA hospitals! SPOOKY!!

  • Pingback: Extending the Sin Tax to the Tanning Bed | Miller-McCune Online