Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us

What Makes Us Politic


(Photo: Ken Zirkel/Flickr)

Are You Planning to Vote in the Upcoming Mid-Term Election?

• July 14, 2014 • 10:00 AM

(Photo: Ken Zirkel/Flickr)

What if it’s raining that day?

I wrote a few weeks ago about the commonly observed phenomenon that the president’s party tends to lose House seats in mid-term elections, but I didn’t really get into why this happens. What’s going on there? Is it pretty common for people to be enamored of a presidential candidate, but then turn against him and his party two years later when he’s failed to deliver on his promises?

Not really. Lynn Vavreck had a nice post out in April explaining that mid-term seat loss isn’t really about swing voters changing their minds between elections. Rather, it’s about people staying home. Presidential campaigns, with their high levels of spending and media attention and turnout efforts, draw a great many peripheral voters into the electorate. These are the people who put the winning presidential candidate over the top. In a mid-term, which sees substantially less attention and spending, many of these voters stay home. Turnout in mid-term elections tends to be around 20 percentage points lower than in presidential ones.

If your state requires voters to register weeks or even months before Election Day, if it requires photo identification for voters, or if the polls are open for shorter hours, fewer people will participate.

Can this turnout be manipulated? A bit, but not easily. National party groups may try to boost turnout in mid-terms, but they rarely have much impact. Part of the problem is that there just aren’t that many competitive House or Senate elections across the country. In a presidential campaign, everyone’s exposed to the election news to some extent, but the campaigning in a mid-term year is very focused on a few competitive areas. And, perhaps, more importantly, the president’s name—the most polarizing name in the country—doesn’t appear on the ballot.

What else can influence turnout? There’s quite a bit of evidence suggesting weather has an impact. Steven Rogers has some recent research showing that presidential coattails (a presidential candidate’s ability to help congressional candidates of his party) are shortened when there’s more rain on election day. That is, rain makes it costlier for a person to vote, so fewer of these peripheral, non-habitual voters show up. This is consistent with some research by Brad Gomez, Thomas Hansford, and George Krause that examined county-level rainfall records and found that an inch of rain on Election Day tends to depress turnout by about 0.8 percentage points. They additionally found that poor weather seems to affect Democratic voters more, giving Republican candidates an advantage. The link between precipitation and participation is well established.

Logan Woods, a recent graduate student at the University of Illinois, extended this research to primary elections, and found some very tentative evidence of a precipitation effect there as well. But there’s an important wrinkle here: The people less likely to turn out due to adverse weather are the more ideologically moderate. So bad weather tends to make the primary electorate more ideologically extreme, which might well mean that bad weather produces more polarized nominees. This is a chilling thought for the future given forecasts for more extreme weather.

Of course, turnout is also influenced by institutional rules. If your state requires voters to register weeks or even months before Election Day, if it requires photo identification for voters, or if the polls are open for shorter hours, fewer people will participate. And it doesn’t help that we, unlike many other countries, hold our elections on a weekday, rather than on a weekend or a national voting holiday. Indeed, it’s somewhat perverse that we hold more elections than almost any other democracy but make it relatively hard to participate in them.

Seth Masket
Seth Masket is a political scientist at the University of Denver, specializing in political parties, state legislatures, campaigns and elections, and social networks. He is the author of No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures (University of Michigan Press, 2009). Follow him on Twitter @smotus.

More From Seth Masket

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

October 30 • 2:00 PM

How Dark Money Got a Mining Company Everything It Wanted

An accidentally released court filing reveals how one company secretly gave money to a non-profit that helped get favorable mining legislation passed.

October 30 • 12:00 PM

The Halloween Industrial Complex

The scariest thing about Halloween might be just how seriously we take it. For this week’s holiday, Americans of all ages will spend more than $5 billion on disposable costumes and bite-size candy.

October 30 • 10:00 AM

Sky’s the Limit: The Case for Selling Air Rights

Lower taxes and debt, increased revenue for the city, and a much better use of space in already dense environments: Selling air rights and encouraging upward growth seem like no-brainers, but NIMBY resistance and philosophical barriers remain.

October 30 • 9:00 AM

Cycles of Fear and Bias in the Criminal Justice System

Exploring the psychological roots of racial disparity in U.S. prisons.

October 30 • 8:00 AM

How Do You Make a Living, Email Newsletter Writer?

Noah Davis talks to Wait But Why writer Tim Urban about the newsletter concept, the research process, and escaping “money-flushing toilet” status.

October 30 • 6:00 AM

Dreamers of the Carbon-Free Dream

Can California go full-renewable?

October 30 • 5:08 AM

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it’s probably something we should work on.

October 30 • 4:00 AM

He’s Definitely a Liberal—Just Check Out His Brain Scan

New research finds political ideology can be easily determined by examining how one’s brain reacts to disgusting images.

October 29 • 4:00 PM

Should We Prosecute Climate Change Protesters Who Break the Law?

A conversation with Bristol County, Massachusetts, District Attorney Sam Sutter, who dropped steep charges against two climate change protesters.

October 29 • 2:23 PM

Innovation Geography: The Beginning of the End for Silicon Valley

Will a lack of affordable housing hinder the growth of creative start-ups?

October 29 • 2:00 PM

Trapped in the Tobacco Debt Trap

A refinance of Niagara County, New York’s tobacco bonds was good news—but for investors, not taxpayers.

October 29 • 12:00 PM

Purity and Self-Mutilation in Thailand

During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, a group of chosen ones known as the mah song torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.

October 29 • 10:00 AM

Can Proposition 47 Solve California’s Problem With Mass Incarceration?

Reducing penalties for low-level felonies could be the next step in rolling back draconian sentencing laws and addressing the criminal justice system’s long legacy of racism.

October 29 • 9:00 AM

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.

October 29 • 8:00 AM

America’s Bathrooms Are a Total Failure

No matter which American bathroom is crowned in this year’s America’s Best Restroom contest, it will still have a host of terrible flaws.

October 29 • 6:00 AM

Tell Us What You Really Think

In politics, are we always just looking out for No. 1?

October 29 • 4:00 AM

Racial Resentment Drives Tea Party Membership

New research finds a strong link between tea party membership and anti-black feelings.

October 28 • 4:00 PM

The New Health App on Apple’s iOS 8 Is Literally Dangerous

Design isn’t neutral. Design is a picture of inequality, of systems of power, and domination both subtle and not. Apple should know that.

October 28 • 2:00 PM

And You Thought Your Credit Card Debt Was Bad

In Niagara County, New York, leaders took on 40-year debt to pay for short-term stuff, a case study in the perverse incentives tobacco bonds create.

October 28 • 10:00 AM

How Valuable Is It to Cure a Disease?

It depends on the disease—for some, breast cancer and AIDS for example, non-curative therapy that can extend life a little or a lot is considered invaluable. For hepatitis C, it seems that society and the insurance industry have decided that curative therapy simply costs too much.

October 28 • 8:00 AM

Can We Read Our Way Out of Sadness?

How books can help save lives.

Follow us

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it's probably something we should work on.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.

Incumbents, Pray for Rain

Come next Tuesday, rain could push voters toward safer, more predictable candidates.

Could Economics Benefit From Computer Science Thinking?

Computational complexity could offer new insight into old ideas in biology and, yes, even the dismal science.

Politicians Really Aren’t Better Decision Makers

Politicians took part in a classic choice experiment but failed to do better than the rest of us.

The Big One

One town, Champlain, New York, was the source of nearly half the scams targeting small businesses in the United States last year. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.