Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


For Many, Playing the Lottery Undermines Self-Control

• September 12, 2013 • 4:00 AM


New research refines our understanding of how materialistic thoughts diminish our ability to restrain our impulses.

Do your waistline and/or credit card balance indicate you have trouble with self-restraint? If so, here’s a tip: Avoid playing the lottery.

Recently published research provides evidence doing so “tends to activate materialistic thoughts,” which in turn lead to a breakdown in self-control.

The problem, according to a study published in the Journal of Consumer Research, is that for most people, a lottery ticket leads to thoughts of the wonderful things you would buy if you hit the jackpot. That focus on concrete, specific items—a type of thinking psychologists call “low-level construal”—makes it very difficult to exercise self-control.

“People, upon entering a lottery, tend to think about specific purchases, and a rush of pleasurable thoughts accompanies them (e.g., ‘I would buy a red BMW Z4 convertible’),” writes Hyeong Min Kim of John Hopkins University. “These thoughts appear to crowd out other thoughts related to the downsides of spending, or more prudent ways the money might be used.”

“Self-control is perhaps one of the most important attributes that a person needs to succeed. Materialism has a negative impact on it, and that is of concern to not only individuals, but also society.”

“Self-control is perhaps one of the most important attributes that a person needs to succeed,” he adds. “Materialism has a negative impact on it, and that is of concern to not only individuals, but also society.”

Thus it’s important to understand what triggers materialistic thoughts, and how they lead to a lack of self-control. Kim explored that equation in a series of studies.

The first featured 46 people from the New York metropolitan area, who were told they were taking part in two separate studies. First, they answered questions about how often, if ever, they played the lottery. Then, they took part in a quick-response task which measured how rapidly they would recognize certain phrases, including “Rolex watch” and “Gucci handbag.”

A bowl featuring 30 M&Ms was placed in each participant’s cubicle; they were told they could eat as many as they liked. Also, as they began, half of the participants were given an instant lottery ticket (with a $25,000 jackpot). They were instructed not to scratch it (and reveal any winnings) until the end of the session. The idea, they were told, was “to make this study fun.”

In fact, it was to see whether the idea of making a quick 25 grand would influence their behavior—which it did. “The participants who received a lottery ticket responded faster to the materialistic phrases, and consumed more M&Ms than those in the control condition,” Kim reports.

Another study featured 90 people, including 38 who bought a $1 lottery ticket at the beginning of the session. All were given three minutes to write down, in separate sentences, “any thoughts they were having.” Researchers then assessed whether they were thinking in concrete or more abstract terms.

Finally, they were asked whether they would prefer a $6 coupon or a $12 rebate on a $40 flash drive. The mail-in rebate required “a minimal level of effort,” but couldn’t be claimed for three weeks.

The results: “Participants who bought a lottery ticket preferred an immediate reward to a larger, delayed reward,” Kim writes. What’s more, the thoughts they wrote down were more concrete and specific than those of non-lottery players.

A final experiment pointed to a way out of this spiral. After being given a $1 lottery ticket, participants were asked either about “products or brands that they would like to buy if they won,” or about places they’d like to travel if they hit the jackpot. All were then given a similar choice as participants in the previous study: a $20 instant rebate on a $60 item, or a $28 mail-in rebate they would receive in a month.

Those who had written about possessions they were longing for were far more likely to choose the instant-gratification option than those who were thinking about travel (who were no more likely to make that choice than members of a control group). Writing about travel apparently led participants to think in more long-term or abstract ways, negating the unwanted effect of the lottery ticket.

“Lottery-induced self-control failure is not universal,” Kim concludes. But his research suggests it is “predominant.” He adds that plenty of other activities also activate “a burst of materialistic thoughts,” including “media filled with lavish consumption.”

That’s why you can’t stop snacking on Bon-Bons as you leaf through Vanity Fair.

So catalysts creating a materialist mindset are all over, and purchasing a lottery ticket is a strong one. If you do so, go right home afterwards—and keep the computer off. Some of those online sales will probably look pretty enticing.

Tom Jacobs
Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Ventura County Star.

More From Tom Jacobs

Tags: ,

If you would like to comment on this post, or anything else on Pacific Standard, visit our Facebook or Google+ page, or send us a message on Twitter. You can also follow our regular updates and other stories on both LinkedIn and Tumblr.

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and, delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow us

Subscribe Now

Quick Studies

What Makes You Neurotic?

A new study gets to the root of our anxieties.

Fecal Donor Banks Are Possible and Could Save Lives

Defrosted fecal matter can be gross to talk about, but the benefits are too remarkable to tiptoe around.

How Junk Food Companies Manipulate Your Tongue

We mistakenly think that harder foods contain fewer calories, and those mistakes can affect our belt sizes.

What Steve Jobs’ Death Teaches Us About Public Health

Studies have shown that when public figures die from disease, the public takes notice. New research suggests this could be the key to reaching those who are most at risk.

Speed-Reading Apps Will Not Revolutionize Anything, Except Your Understanding

The one-word-at-a-time presentation eliminates the eye movements that help you comprehend what you're reading.

The Big One

One state—Pennsylvania—logs 52 percent of all sales, shipments, and receipts for the chocolate manufacturing industry. March/April 2014