Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


Quick Studies

Figure skater Fontana from Italy performs during the "2010 All That Skate Summer" ice show in Goyang

Figure skater Silvia Fontana from Italy. (Photo: queenyuna/Flickr)

Can You Learn to Judge Creativity?

• April 04, 2014 • 9:26 AM

Figure skater Silvia Fontana from Italy. (Photo: queenyuna/Flickr)

A new study suggests that, with training, amateurs can judge the level of creativity of artwork much like experts would. But is expert opinion always correct?

Once every four years, Americans gather around their television screens to partake in a national pastime, delivering brash, passionate opinions on a topic they barely understand—Olympic figure skating.

Of all the Olympic sports, figure skating is particularly attractive for the armchair judge because the scoring is more subjective than measuring a stick or declaring that a ball went into the net. Artistry ostensibly garners more points than a lifeless, mechanical performance.

Judging creativity, especially in high-stakes situations like the Olympics, is a contentious topic. Who is truly qualified to judge the creativity of a work of art or performance? And can you, as a casual, quadrennial ice-skating observer, ever rise to the ranks of a professional Olympic figure-skating judge?

A new research paper suggests that amateurs can, indeed, be trained to be better judges of creativity—at least when it comes to children’s paintings.

Study participants in the training group were given a brief lesson about the “subcomponents” of creativity, as determined by previous research. The training group participated in a practice round, where it rated the creativity level of paintings from one (not creative at all) to seven (very creative). Afterwards, the participants were told the “actual” creativity level, provided by a panel of expert judges.

“Non-trained judges seemed to agree on something else than the real creativity of the drawings.”

The control group, on the other hand, performed an unrelated task with the set of paintings. These subjects did not learn about the components of creativity.

The results showed that participants in the training group were more likely to excel at judging the creativity of children’s paintings in two distinct ways.

First, those who received training were more likely than the control group to deliver similar creativity ratings as the panel of expert judges.

Additionally, when the training group returned to the lab four weeks later to rate the same exact paintings, it tended to be more reliable, rating the paintings the same as it had in the first trial. The control group was not as reliable with its ratings.

Interestingly enough, while the control group participants’ ratings did not match the experts’, they did tend to agree with one another. In fact, they agreed with each other just as much as the experts and the training group. The authors write, “Non-trained judges seemed to agree on something else than the real creativity of the drawings.”

One mitigating factor, they hypothesize, could be that the group of participants was relatively homogenous—mostly young female university students.

The researchers say there’s no way to know what the untrained group was measuring. They emphasize that agreement with expert opinion should be the baseline of true creativity—after all, they do research creativity for a living.

Still, four years from now when you’re loudly debating the lack of spark in Ashley Wagner’s triple lutz—fifth beer of the night in hand—it’s good to know that while your opinion might not vibe with the experts, it’ll likely be the same as that of your barroom compatriots.

Bettina Chang
Associate Digital Editor Bettina Chang previously directed editorial content at HomeStyle and Real Estate Weekly. A Chicago native, she serves on the board of directors for Supplies for Dreams, working to improve education outcomes for Chicago Public Schools students. Follow her on Twitter @bechang8.

More From Bettina Chang

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

October 31 • 4:00 AM

The Power of Third Person Plural on Support for Public Policies

Researchers find citizens react differently to policy proposals when they’re framed as impacting “people,” as opposed to “you.”


October 30 • 4:00 PM

I Should Have Told My High School Students About My Struggle With Drinking

As a teacher, my students confided in me about many harrowing aspects of their lives. I never crossed the line and shared my biggest problem with them—but now I wish I had.


October 30 • 2:00 PM

How Dark Money Got a Mining Company Everything It Wanted

An accidentally released court filing reveals how one company secretly gave money to a non-profit that helped get favorable mining legislation passed.


October 30 • 12:00 PM

The Halloween Industrial Complex

The scariest thing about Halloween might be just how seriously we take it. For this week’s holiday, Americans of all ages will spend more than $5 billion on disposable costumes and bite-size candy.


October 30 • 10:00 AM

Sky’s the Limit: The Case for Selling Air Rights

Lower taxes and debt, increased revenue for the city, and a much better use of space in already dense environments: Selling air rights and encouraging upward growth seem like no-brainers, but NIMBY resistance and philosophical barriers remain.


October 30 • 9:00 AM

Cycles of Fear and Bias in the Criminal Justice System

Exploring the psychological roots of racial disparity in U.S. prisons.


October 30 • 8:00 AM

How Do You Make a Living, Email Newsletter Writer?

Noah Davis talks to Wait But Why writer Tim Urban about the newsletter concept, the research process, and escaping “money-flushing toilet” status.



October 30 • 6:00 AM

Dreamers of the Carbon-Free Dream

Can California go full-renewable?


October 30 • 5:08 AM

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it’s probably something we should work on.


October 30 • 4:00 AM

He’s Definitely a Liberal—Just Check Out His Brain Scan

New research finds political ideology can be easily determined by examining how one’s brain reacts to disgusting images.


October 29 • 4:00 PM

Should We Prosecute Climate Change Protesters Who Break the Law?

A conversation with Bristol County, Massachusetts, District Attorney Sam Sutter, who dropped steep charges against two climate change protesters.


October 29 • 2:23 PM

Innovation Geography: The Beginning of the End for Silicon Valley

Will a lack of affordable housing hinder the growth of creative start-ups?


October 29 • 2:00 PM

Trapped in the Tobacco Debt Trap

A refinance of Niagara County, New York’s tobacco bonds was good news—but for investors, not taxpayers.


October 29 • 12:00 PM

Purity and Self-Mutilation in Thailand

During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, a group of chosen ones known as the mah song torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.


October 29 • 10:00 AM

Can Proposition 47 Solve California’s Problem With Mass Incarceration?

Reducing penalties for low-level felonies could be the next step in rolling back draconian sentencing laws and addressing the criminal justice system’s long legacy of racism.


October 29 • 9:00 AM

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.


October 29 • 8:00 AM

America’s Bathrooms Are a Total Failure

No matter which American bathroom is crowned in this year’s America’s Best Restroom contest, it will still have a host of terrible flaws.



October 29 • 6:00 AM

Tell Us What You Really Think

In politics, are we always just looking out for No. 1?


October 29 • 4:00 AM

Racial Resentment Drives Tea Party Membership

New research finds a strong link between tea party membership and anti-black feelings.


October 28 • 4:00 PM

The New Health App on Apple’s iOS 8 Is Literally Dangerous

Design isn’t neutral. Design is a picture of inequality, of systems of power, and domination both subtle and not. Apple should know that.


October 28 • 2:00 PM

And You Thought Your Credit Card Debt Was Bad

In Niagara County, New York, leaders took on 40-year debt to pay for short-term stuff, a case study in the perverse incentives tobacco bonds create.



October 28 • 10:00 AM

How Valuable Is It to Cure a Disease?

It depends on the disease—for some, breast cancer and AIDS for example, non-curative therapy that can extend life a little or a lot is considered invaluable. For hepatitis C, it seems that society and the insurance industry have decided that curative therapy simply costs too much.


Follow us


We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it's probably something we should work on.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.

Incumbents, Pray for Rain

Come next Tuesday, rain could push voters toward safer, more predictable candidates.

Could Economics Benefit From Computer Science Thinking?

Computational complexity could offer new insight into old ideas in biology and, yes, even the dismal science.

Politicians Really Aren’t Better Decision Makers

Politicians took part in a classic choice experiment but failed to do better than the rest of us.

The Big One

One town, Champlain, New York, was the source of nearly half the scams targeting small businesses in the United States last year. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.