Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


Health Care

emergency-intake

Emergency intake area in a hospital. (Photo: Tyler Olson/Shutterstock)

Why You Should Be Alarmed About Pediatric Emergency Care in the U.S.

• July 17, 2014 • 6:00 AM

Emergency intake area in a hospital. (Photo: Tyler Olson/Shutterstock)

The vast majority of doctors working in emergency care have received only four months of training in pediatrics, and what they learned about treating full-grown adults rarely translates well.

It has been two years since 12-year-old Rory Staunton died from overwhelming sepsis, a severe bloodstream infection and the number one killer in hospitals and 11th leading cause of death in the United States. His death triggered a major initiative nationwide to reduce the morbidity of this rapidly progressive and frequently fatal disease. In fact, Governor Andrew Cuomo announced last year that New York would lead the nation as the first state to require hospitals to adopt evidence-based protocols and checklists to facilitate quick diagnosis and timely life-saving treatment for children with sepsis. In children’s hospitals all over the state, the term “sepsis guidelines” has become household lingo, as hospital task forces struggle to meet the governor’s deadline to initiate these protocols. The energy behind this endeavor is infectious and one is led to believe that the initiation of these guidelines is the singular answer to saving children’s lives.

But is it?

The adage that children are not just small adults is especially true in the case of emergency medicine, where weight-based dosing and age-appropriate vital signs come as second nature to pediatricians and as a foreign language to non-pediatric trained MDs.

It is if you believe that protocols and checklists can practice medicine. But there are at least some who believe that reliance on guidelines can impart to young and inexperienced physicians—or to physicians not savvy in the care of sick kids—a sense of false security, which can lead to under-appreciation of critical warning signs that can hide from institutional guidelines.

In 2005, there were over 20 million emergency department (ED) visits in the United States by children under 18 years of age. It is a little known fact that only one in 10 of those visits were to pediatric EDs staffed by physicians with six years of post-medical school residency and sub-specialty training in pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine. The remaining 90 percent of children were cared for in community hospital EDs by undoubtedly smart, talented, caring, and conscientious emergency physicians with four years of training in emergency medicine but, in most cases, only four monthsof training in pediatrics. Their education in pediatrics represents less than 10 percent of their training, while close to 30 percent of their patients fall into the pediatric age group. Throughout the U.S., and even where major medical centers abound and where groundbreaking advances in medicine are made daily, children are cared for by community hospital emergency physicians not sufficiently trained to treat them.

This disconnect was highlighted in a 2006 Institute of Medicine report, “Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains,” published by the National Academy of Sciences, that found that many providers of general, not sub-specialty, emergency care feel stress and anxiety when caring for children that they do not feel when caring for adults. Often, these providers undertreat or fail to stabilize seriously ill children, and there is wide variation of treatment patterns. Simply put, general emergency care providers in community EDs, who are the consummate experts in the treatment and resuscitation of critically ill adults, are not as equipped to care for our kids as are specially trained pediatric emergency care providers.

This year, the work of a privately supported non-profit quality improvement program called ImPACTS (Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation) has led to the same conclusion. Through 200 simulated pediatric emergencies run in 25 EDs nationwide, including 17 general (community) EDs and eight pediatric EDs, the group found that 93.3 percent of pediatric EDs were compliant with guidelines in the treatment of pediatric septic shock compared with only 13.6 percent of general EDs. Community EDs showed deficiencies in delivering life-saving fluids and blood pressure medications, were less likely to correctly dose medications to kids, and were less likely to comply with American Heart Association guidelines in pediatric cardiac arrest.

The adage that children are not just small adults is especially true in the case of emergency medicine, where weight-based dosing and age-appropriate vital signs come as second nature to pediatricians and as a foreign language to non-pediatric trained MDs. But there’s more than that going on here. There’s a certain gestalt about what makes a child normal or not normal, sick or not sick, that comes with treating children all day, every day, over years of practice; it’s a look, a smell, a feel a pediatrician has when looking at a kid. This can’t be achieved through guidelines and protocols and checklists.

It is crystal clear that emergency medicine physicians who move on after residency to treat children in community hospital EDs are often unprepared to deliver the standard of care to our nation’s acutely ill or injured, and the provision of guidelines and protocols is a first step to fix that. But it’s a quick fix, and an insufficient one at that.

Throughout the U.S., and even where major medical centers abound and where groundbreaking advances are made daily, children are cared for by community hospital emergency physicians not sufficiently trained to treat them.

What is needed is greater exposure to pediatrics and pediatric emergency care successfully and innovatively incorporated into formal training. In addition, there should be a mandatory component of continuing medical education for emergency medicine residency graduates—targeted specifically toward community hospital emergency physicians—that includes continuing education in pediatrics. Finally, and probably most importantly, systems should be in place whereby formal partnerships are established between community hospital EDs and regional children’s hospitals. These collaborations will allow a continuous exchange of information, including just-in-time pediatric consultations, pediatric education forums, and ongoing simulation exercises with pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Not every community can support a designated children’s hospital with a dedicated pediatric ED. These collaborations could go a long way toward narrowing the information gap.

Naysayers may argue that four-year-long emergency medicine residency programs are already lengthy, and that there is not enough flexibility in the schedule to allow more pediatric training. These residency programs have multiple requirements already specified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, including training in obstetrics, adult critical care, emergency preparedness, and EMT. Some argue that physicians should be able to learn pediatrics from on-the-job training. But it is difficult to imagine that these physicians can become experts in a patient population that is not their primary focus; while community hospital emergency doctors see close to 90 percent of the nation’s sick kids, these children still represent at most, and often much less than, 25 percent of the emergency patients they see.

The future will bring many patients like Rory Staunton. Children will continue to sustain trauma, develop cancer, slip into coma, suffer from heart disease, have seizures, and, yes, they will contract sepsis too. Just like adults, they will continue to suffer the misfortune of serious and potentially fatal trauma and illness. Guidelines alone cannot possibly treat all of the pathology that these children will exhibit. The state-mandated sepsis guidelines that are generating so much enthusiasm among advocacy groups, hospitals, and politicians are just a single step in the right direction. Their strength is in their power to standardize management, and certainly can’t hurt; however, they will likely cure only a small part of the problem.

Joan Bregstein
Joan Bregstein is an associate professor of pediatrics at Columbia University Medical Center in New York City and specialty-boarded in pediatric emergency medicine, which she has been practicing and teaching at Columbia for close to 20 years. She is a public voices fellow with The OpEd Project.

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

October 31 • 4:00 PM

Should the Victims of the War on Drugs Receive Reparations?

A drug war Truth and Reconciliation Commission along the lines of post-apartheid South Africa is a radical idea proposed by the Green Party. Substance.com asks their candidates for New York State’s gubernatorial election to tell us more.


October 31 • 2:00 PM

India’s Struggle to Get Reliable Power to Hundreds of Millions of People

India’s new Prime Minister Narendra Modi is known as a “big thinker” when it comes to energy. But in his country’s case, could thinking big be a huge mistake?


October 31 • 12:00 PM

In the Picture: SNAP Food Benefits, Birthday Cake, and Walmart

In every issue, we fix our gaze on an everyday photograph and chase down facts about details in the frame.


October 31 • 10:15 AM

Levels of Depression Could Be Evaluated Through Measurements of Acoustic Speech

Engineers find tell-tale signs in speech patterns of the depressed.


October 31 • 8:00 AM

Who Wants a Cute Congressman?

You probably do—even if you won’t admit it. In politics, looks aren’t everything, but they’re definitely something.


October 31 • 7:00 AM

Why Scientists Make Promises They Can’t Keep

A research proposal that is totally upfront about the uncertainty of the scientific process and its potential benefits might never pass governmental muster.


October 31 • 6:12 AM

The Psychology of a Horror Movie Fan

Scientists have tried to figure out the appeal of axe murderers and creepy dolls, but it mostly remains a spooky mystery.


October 31 • 4:00 AM

The Power of Third Person Plural on Support for Public Policies

Researchers find citizens react differently to policy proposals when they’re framed as impacting “people,” as opposed to “you.”


October 30 • 4:00 PM

I Should Have Told My High School Students About My Struggle With Drinking

As a teacher, my students confided in me about many harrowing aspects of their lives. I never crossed the line and shared my biggest problem with them—but now I wish I had.


October 30 • 2:00 PM

How Dark Money Got a Mining Company Everything It Wanted

An accidentally released court filing reveals how one company secretly gave money to a non-profit that helped get favorable mining legislation passed.


October 30 • 12:00 PM

The Halloween Industrial Complex

The scariest thing about Halloween might be just how seriously we take it. For this week’s holiday, Americans of all ages will spend more than $5 billion on disposable costumes and bite-size candy.


October 30 • 10:00 AM

Sky’s the Limit: The Case for Selling Air Rights

Lower taxes and debt, increased revenue for the city, and a much better use of space in already dense environments: Selling air rights and encouraging upward growth seem like no-brainers, but NIMBY resistance and philosophical barriers remain.


October 30 • 9:00 AM

Cycles of Fear and Bias in the Criminal Justice System

Exploring the psychological roots of racial disparity in U.S. prisons.


October 30 • 8:00 AM

How Do You Make a Living, Email Newsletter Writer?

Noah Davis talks to Wait But Why writer Tim Urban about the newsletter concept, the research process, and escaping “money-flushing toilet” status.



October 30 • 6:00 AM

Dreamers of the Carbon-Free Dream

Can California go full-renewable?


October 30 • 5:08 AM

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it’s probably something we should work on.


October 30 • 4:00 AM

He’s Definitely a Liberal—Just Check Out His Brain Scan

New research finds political ideology can be easily determined by examining how one’s brain reacts to disgusting images.


October 29 • 4:00 PM

Should We Prosecute Climate Change Protesters Who Break the Law?

A conversation with Bristol County, Massachusetts, District Attorney Sam Sutter, who dropped steep charges against two climate change protesters.


October 29 • 2:23 PM

Innovation Geography: The Beginning of the End for Silicon Valley

Will a lack of affordable housing hinder the growth of creative start-ups?


October 29 • 2:00 PM

Trapped in the Tobacco Debt Trap

A refinance of Niagara County, New York’s tobacco bonds was good news—but for investors, not taxpayers.


October 29 • 12:00 PM

Purity and Self-Mutilation in Thailand

During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, a group of chosen ones known as the mah song torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.


October 29 • 10:00 AM

Can Proposition 47 Solve California’s Problem With Mass Incarceration?

Reducing penalties for low-level felonies could be the next step in rolling back draconian sentencing laws and addressing the criminal justice system’s long legacy of racism.


October 29 • 9:00 AM

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.


October 29 • 8:00 AM

America’s Bathrooms Are a Total Failure

No matter which American bathroom is crowned in this year’s America’s Best Restroom contest, it will still have a host of terrible flaws.


Follow us


Levels of Depression Could Be Evaluated Through Measurements of Acoustic Speech

Engineers find tell-tale signs in speech patterns of the depressed.

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it's probably something we should work on.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.

Incumbents, Pray for Rain

Come next Tuesday, rain could push voters toward safer, more predictable candidates.

Could Economics Benefit From Computer Science Thinking?

Computational complexity could offer new insight into old ideas in biology and, yes, even the dismal science.

The Big One

One town, Champlain, New York, was the source of nearly half the scams targeting small businesses in the United States last year. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.