Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us

Greenhouse Gas Reports Send Stock Prices Higher?

• May 03, 2012 • 10:02 AM

Coming clean about greenhouse gas emissions can make some companies squeamish. Because emissions are bad, businesses fear that talking about them might be, too. But a new study out of the University of California, Davis finds that by entering into the conversation voluntarily, companies can boost their bottom line.

A study of 172 companies found that stock prices jumped, on average, a half a percent in the five days surrounding an emissions-related press release. While that change might not seem substantial, bundling all those little benefits together meant an extra $10 billion for the companies included in the survey.

“There was some concern the greenhouse gas emissions disclosures would be interpreted the wrong way,” explains the Paul Griffin, the study’s author and a professor of management at UC Davis. “There’s always a downside risk, and I think that risk is moving down, not up.”

For big operations that gab a lot about their goings on, disclosures don’t make quite as big a splash as, say, a small company with a quieter public relations department. While both came out ahead, smaller companies did better with a 2.32 percent average increase in stock price two days after a press release was issued; larger firms saw a less-dramatic 0.48 percent increase. The reason for the favorable response from investors, explains Griffin, is that talking about emissions sounds like environmental responsibility.

The news that companies benefit from entering the conversation is good, but the medium is important. When the company spills news about their environmental impact in a mandatory government filing, the disclosure can seem forced and both investors and customers are more likely to approach the information with concern. “Because companies have an obligation to file these reports, there’s an equal likelihood for good and bad news,” says Griffin. When companies control the message by volunteering it, coming clean on emissions has rewards that are more than just intrinsic.

Rachel Swaby
Rachel Swaby is a freelance writer based in San Francisco. She is a frequent contributor to Wired, Gizmodo, and Afar, and a senior editor at Longshot Magazine. She can be found on Twitter (@rachelswaby), or playing the newest iPad puzzle game.

More From Rachel Swaby

Tags: ,

If you would like to comment on this post, or anything else on Pacific Standard, visit our Facebook or Google+ page, or send us a message on Twitter. You can also follow our regular updates and other stories on both LinkedIn and Tumblr.

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and, delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow us

Subscribe Now

Quick Studies

Banning Chocolate Milk Was a Bad Choice

The costs of banning America's favorite kids drink from schools may outweigh the benefits, a new study suggests.

In Battle Against Climate Change, Cities Are Left All Alone

Cities must play a critical role in shifting the world to a fossil fuel-free future. So why won't anybody help them?

When a Romance Is Threatened, People Rebound With God

And when they feel God might reject them, they buddy up to their partner.

How Can We Protect Open Ocean That Does Not Yet Exist?

As global warming melts ice and ushers in a wave of commercial activity in the Arctic, scientists are thinking about how to protect environments of the future.

What Kind of Beat Makes You Want to Groove?

The science behind the rhythms that get you on the dance floor.

The Big One

One state—Pennsylvania—logs 52 percent of all sales, shipments, and receipts for the chocolate manufacturing industry. March/April 2014