Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


Findings

tv

(Photo: TaraPatta/Shutterstock)

Television and Overeating: What We Watch Matters

• September 01, 2014 • 1:00 PM

(Photo: TaraPatta/Shutterstock)

New research finds fast-moving programming leads to mindless overeating.

And the answer to America’s obesity epidemic is: We all need to watch more of Charlie Rose.

OK, that’s not precisely the conclusion of a new study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. But it does suggest that our choice of programming may be directly related to our girth.

It has long been established that television watching is linked to unhealthy eating. A 2011 meta-study, which examined the results of 53 previously published papers, concluded that television can “act as a distraction, resulting in a lack of awareness of actual food consumption, or overlooking food cues that may lead to overconsumption.”

OK, but do certain kinds of programs act as more effective distractions, leading to higher levels of mindless eating? That’s the issue addressed in the new study, conducted by a research team led by Aner Tal of Cornell University.

A 2011 meta-study, which examined the results of 53 previously published papers, concluded that television can “act as a distraction, resulting in a lack of awareness of actual food consumption, or overlooking food cues that may lead to overconsumption.”

Ninety-four undergraduates gathered in groups of up to 20 to watch TV for 20 minutes. Each participant was provided with “generous amounts of four snacks—M&Ms, cookies, carrots, and grapes—and allowed to eat as much as they wanted.” The food was weighed before and after the sessions to determine how much of each item was eaten.

The students were randomly assigned to watch one of three programs: An excerpt from the action movie The Island, starring Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson; a segment of the PBS interview program hosted by Charlie Rose; or that same excerpt from The Island, only shown without sound.

The two programs differed enormously in terms of visual stimulation: The Island averaged 24.7 camera cuts per minute, while the interview show averaged only 4.8. Sound-source fluctuation was also far higher for the film.

As the researchers suspected, participants whose eyes and ears were overwhelmed were most likely to chow down. Those who watched the film excerpt (with sound) ate nearly twice as many grams of food than those who watched Charlie Rose. They also consumed 65 percent more calories.

Even while watching the silent version of The Island, and thus receiving visual but not auditory stimulation, participants ate 36 percent more grams of food than those watching Rose, and consumed 46 percent more calories.

“The more distracting a TV show, the less attention people appear to pay to eating, and the more they eat,” the researchers conclude.

So it isn’t just that television viewing is, by definition, a sedentary habit. Or that commercials can coax us into craving unhealthy foods. Watching a fast-moving program with rapid cuts—which defines a whole lot of today’s content—leaves us largely unaware of just how much we’re stuffing into our mouths.

The obvious answer—one that should be disseminated by physicians and health educators—is that eating and television viewing should be separate activities. Unless, that is, you’re enjoying the relaxed rhythms of a public television interview show.

Tom Jacobs
Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Ventura County Star.

More From Tom Jacobs

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

December 20 • 10:28 AM

Flare-Ups

Are my emotions making me ill?


December 19 • 4:00 PM

How a Drug Policy Reform Organization Thinks of the Children

This valuable, newly updated resource for parents is based in the real world.


December 19 • 2:00 PM

Where Did the Ouija Board Come From?

It wasn’t just a toy.


December 19 • 12:00 PM

Social Scientists Can Do More to Eradicate Racial Oppression

Using our knowledge of social systems, all social scientists—black or white, race scholar or not—have an opportunity to challenge white privilege.


December 19 • 10:17 AM

How Scientists Contribute to Bad Science Reporting

By not taking university press officers and research press releases seriously, scientists are often complicit in the media falsehoods they so often deride.


December 19 • 10:00 AM

Pentecostalism in West Africa: A Boon or Barrier to Disease?

How has Ghana stayed Ebola-free despite being at high risk for infection? A look at their American-style Pentecostalism, a religion that threatens to do more harm than good.


December 19 • 8:00 AM

Don’t Text and Drive—Especially If You’re Old

A new study shows that texting while driving becomes even more dangerous with age.


December 19 • 6:12 AM

All That ‘Call of Duty’ With Your Friends Has Not Made You a More Violent Person

But all that solo Call of Duty has.


December 19 • 4:00 AM

Food for Thought: WIC Works

New research finds participation in the federal WIC program, which subsidizes healthy foods for young children, is linked with stronger cognitive development and higher test scores.


December 18 • 4:00 PM

How I Navigated Life as a Newly Sober Mom

Saying “no” to my kids was harder than saying “no” to alcohol. But for their sake and mine, I had to learn to put myself first sometimes.


December 18 • 2:00 PM

Women in Apocalyptic Fiction Shaving Their Armpits

Because our interest in realism apparently only goes so far.


December 18 • 12:00 PM

The Paradox of Choice, 10 Years Later

Paul Hiebert talks to psychologist Barry Schwartz about how modern trends—social media, FOMO, customer review sites—fit in with arguments he made a decade ago in his highly influential book, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less.


December 18 • 10:00 AM

What It’s Like to Spend a Few Hours in the Church of Scientology

Wrestling with thetans, attempting to unlock a memory bank, and a personality test seemingly aimed at people with depression. This is Scientology’s “dissemination drill” for potential new members.


December 18 • 8:00 AM

Gendering #BlackLivesMatter: A Feminist Perspective

Black men are stereotyped as violent, while black women are rendered invisible. Here’s why the gendering of black lives matters.


December 18 • 7:06 AM

Apparently You Can Bring Your Religion to Work

New research says offices that encourage talk of religion actually make for happier workplaces.


December 18 • 6:00 AM

The Very Weak and Complicated Links Between Mental Illness and Gun Violence

Vanderbilt University’s Jonathan Metzl and Kenneth MacLeish address our anxieties and correct our assumptions.


December 18 • 4:00 AM

Should Movies Be Rated RD for Reckless Driving?

A new study finds a link between watching films featuring reckless driving and engaging in similar behavior years later.


December 17 • 4:00 PM

How to Run a Drug Dealing Network in Prison

People tend not to hear about the prison drug dealing operations that succeed. Substance.com asks a veteran of the game to explain his system.


December 17 • 2:00 PM

Gender Segregation of Toys Is on the Rise

Charting the use of “toys for boys” and “toys for girls” in American English.


December 17 • 12:41 PM

Why the College Football Playoff Is Terrible But Better Than Before

The sample size is still embarrassingly small, but at least there’s less room for the availability cascade.


December 17 • 11:06 AM

Canadian Kids Have a Serious Smoking Problem

Bootleg cigarette sales could be leading Canadian teens to more serious drugs, a recent study finds.


December 17 • 10:37 AM

A Public Lynching in Sproul Plaza

When photographs of lynching victims showed up on a hallowed site of democracy in action, a provocation was issued—but to whom, by whom, and why?


December 17 • 8:00 AM

What Was the Job?

This was the year the job broke, the year we accepted a re-interpretation of its fundamental bargain and bought in to the push to get us to all work for ourselves rather than each other.


December 17 • 6:00 AM

White Kids Will Be Kids

Even the “good” kids—bound for college, upwardly mobile—sometimes break the law. The difference? They don’t have much to fear. A professor of race and social movements reflects on her teenage years and faces some uncomfortable realities.



Follow us


Don’t Text and Drive—Especially If You’re Old

A new study shows that texting while driving becomes even more dangerous with age.

Apparently You Can Bring Your Religion to Work

New research says offices that encourage talk of religion actually make for happier workplaces.

Canadian Kids Have a Serious Smoking Problem

Bootleg cigarette sales could be leading Canadian teens to more serious drugs, a recent study finds.

The Hidden Psychology of the Home Ref

That old myth of home field bias isn’t a myth at all; it’s a statistical fact.

The Big One

One in two United States senators and two in five House members who left office between 1998 and 2004 became lobbyists. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.