Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


Jonah Lehrer: Requiem for a Writer in a Rush

• August 07, 2012 • 3:35 PM

As a journalist who frequently writes about psychology and brain science, my interests have frequently converged with those of Jonah Lehrer. Indeed, our paths crossed a couple of times. He once picked up one of my blog posts and (giving me full credit) wrote about it in his wired.com blog. Another time, he politely turned down my request for an interview. Sure, he was coming to Santa Barbara to give a lecture, but his schedule was so tight it allowed no time for talking.

In retrospect, I’m wondering if that response helps explain his depressing fall into disgrace. We now know that Lehrer, in his best-selling books about neuroscience, cut corners and made up quotes. The arrogance of someone who got very successful at a very young age? Perhaps. But my suspicion is the answer is more banal: He didn’t have enough time to do his work properly.

Churning out countless blog posts, articles and books, Lehrer was something of a machine. I often marveled at the quality and quantity of his work. In my experience, writing about psychology and the brain tends to be slow, painstaking work. The human mind is complicated; results of even the most startling research tend to be nuanced. Conveying the essence of a study in understandable, relatable language, without oversimplifying it or overstating its importance, takes time and patience. I wondered how Lehrer could possibly be so prolific.

Now, I wonder what demons were driving him, particularly after he achieved so much success. Couldn’t he have pushed back the deadline of his most recent book for a year, giving him time to get it right? Sure, the publisher wanted it ASAP, but why couldn’t he tell them, sorry, it’s not done yet? What is it that compels someone so brilliant and talented to feel the need to produce more and more and more, to the point where he needs to make ethical compromises just to keep running in place?

If there’s an answer to that question, it will have to come from brain science. Unfortunately, unless he can somehow resurrect his credibility, and with it his career, Jonah Lehrer won’t be available to help explain it to us.

Tom Jacobs
Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Ventura County Star.

More From Tom Jacobs

Tags: ,

If you would like to comment on this post, or anything else on Pacific Standard, visit our Facebook or Google+ page, or send us a message on Twitter. You can also follow our regular updates and other stories on both LinkedIn and Tumblr.

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow us


Subscribe Now

Quick Studies

Banning Chocolate Milk Was a Bad Choice

The costs of banning America's favorite kids drink from schools may outweigh the benefits, a new study suggests.

In Battle Against Climate Change, Cities Are Left All Alone

Cities must play a critical role in shifting the world to a fossil fuel-free future. So why won't anybody help them?

When a Romance Is Threatened, People Rebound With God

And when they feel God might reject them, they buddy up to their partner.

How Can We Protect Open Ocean That Does Not Yet Exist?

As global warming melts ice and ushers in a wave of commercial activity in the Arctic, scientists are thinking about how to protect environments of the future.

What Kind of Beat Makes You Want to Groove?

The science behind the rhythms that get you on the dance floor.

The Big One

One state—Pennsylvania—logs 52 percent of all sales, shipments, and receipts for the chocolate manufacturing industry. March/April 2014