Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


babbage-engine

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

5 Hidden Algorithms That Rule Your World

• November 12, 2013 • 8:00 AM

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

From the NSA to OKCupid.

If the 1990s were dominated by the rise of the Internet and the 2000s social media behemoths, perhaps the ’10s are the decade of the algorithm. The word is a kind of cypher for whatever is happening in the world of technology at the moment. A brief survey of recent stories on the subject includes a bridge designed by algorithm, a traffic-reducing algorithm, and a match-making algorithm.

But what is an algorithm, exactly?

An algorithm is a method of processing information, a step-by-step procedure that turns a certain set of data into something else—perhaps a smaller, filtered set of data, an outcome that’s more useful than the original for the user of the algorithm. It’s a process-driven equation, one that’s difficult to define except in vague terms.

The word itself has ancient roots. Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, a mathematician in Baghdad in the 9th century, is known as the creator of algebra, which stems from the word al-jabr, meaning completion, in the context of an equation. In Latin translation, he became Algorismus, which was synonymous with the decimal number system, which the mathematician introduced to the Western world. Algorism was the practice of doing arithmetic with those digits.

Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

Algorithm’s modern usage came to the fore with the evolution of computers. Ada Lovelace was a British mathematician in the mid-19th century who worked with Charles Babbage’s analytical engines—the first computers—and is credited with creating the first computer program, an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers, critical to the number theory field of mathematics.

Lovelace imagined that computers might one day do much more than determine numbers, however important. If the “science of harmony” could be calculated, she once wrote, “the engine might compose elaborate and scientific pieces of music of any degree of complexity or extent.”

But she couldn’t have known the degree to which algorithms would metastasize and come to take over our lives in the 21st century. Below, I introduce five modern algorithms that we should all be aware of, since they alter our technological landscape in much more insidious ways than the Babbage Engine ever did.

1. The NSA’s Surveillance Algorithm

The NSA’s surveillance programs work, or so they claim, by collecting metadata: not the content of your phone calls and emails, but their length, who they connect you to, and when they happen. This mass of metadata is filtered by the agency’s algorithms, which trawl through the collection for triggers that give them reason for further investigation, AKA requisitioning the content of the communications. These triggers could be certain keywords—“offensive information warfare,” “illuminati,” and “computer terrorism” to name a few—or the identities of the people you’re contacting.

In one of the few concrete examples of successful metadata surveillance, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce stated in June that a phone number in San Diego was found to be making calls to the terrorist group al-Shabab in Somalia. The agency traced the number to one man, and further surveillance connected him to three others who were conspiring to send money to the terrorist group. All four were arrested in 2010 and convicted early this year.

Of course, now that details about the algorithm have spread, there’s a good chance it will be less effective. Vice recently launched an NSA spam generator that spits out sentences full of trigger words for would-be surveillance disruptors to insert into their email and confuse the system.

2. Encryption Algorithms

Another way to combat surveillance is to confuse the algorithms—turning their own capabilities against them. Encryption algorithms encode your data, using a secret formula to turn it into an unreadable mass that entities like the NSA can’t process. That’s how post-PRISM services like Silent Circle and Least Authority protect their users’ phone calls and messages from snooping. But encryption algorithms have a very long history.

According to the Roman historian Suetonius, Julius Caesar used the “Caesar cipher” to encode his private correspondence. The algorithm worked by shifting each letter of the alphabet back several places—for example, every D would become an A, every J would become a G, and so on. The message could only be unencrypted if the receiver knew what the shift was. This is a simplistic, easily-broken algorithm, but the German Enigma machine, which was used to encode military texts after World War I, took almost two decades to crack. These days, the NSA just goes straight to the source: It spies on Angela Merkel’s cell phone.

3. Google Search

If you’ve ever had Google fill in the rest of your search text like a mind-reader, you’ve also experienced an algorithm at work. Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

In fact, Google’s search algorithm, which is also referred to as PageRank, is one of the most powerful, secretive algorithms in the world of technology. In a visual explainer of how search works, Google notes that their algorithms “get to work looking for clues to better understand what you mean” by your search terms rather than just their literal content. They then use their formula to determine how relevant a certain page is to what you’re looking for, examining aspects like how often the site is updated and how well it’s connected to the rest of the Internet, putting the most useful links at the top of the search list.

Search-engine optimization (SEO) experts work to crack the code of this algorithm and get their clients’ sites to the top of the page. That’s a tough job, because the algorithm is always evolving, to the tune of 500 to 600 changes a year, to throw off cheaters and better serve searchers.

4. High-Frequency Trading Algorithms

In the heyday of Wall Street, traders shouted across exchange floors to buy and sell stocks. These days, it’s a whole lot quieter—around 50 percent of trading is done by firms specializing in “high-frequency trading” (HFT), which refers to rapid-fire share buys and sells carried out by computer programs rather than humans. Hedge funds that specialize in HFT develop proprietary algorithms to determine what they buy and sell and when, then the programs carry out those instructions in milli- or microseconds. These incredibly fast trades attempt to capitalize on volatile markets, buying before rises and selling before falls, however miniscule. The technology began its meteoric rise in the early ‘90s and became pervasive by 2010, but it’s not without its problems.

“Left unsupervised, algorithms can and will do strange things,” writes Christopher Steiner in his book Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World. In 2012, a “rogue algorithm” belonging to the New York firm Knight Capital glitched out and went on an ill-advised 45-minute trading spree that resulted in a loss of $440 million before it was quickly stopped, Steiner writes. The Flash Crash of 2010, in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1,000 points in a few minutes only to recover the value 20 minutes later, was exacerbated by high-frequency trading. When the algorithms noticed the downswing in the market, firms depending on the programs sold aggressively to protect their investors. In fact, the strategy might be on its way out—France and Italy have both instituted taxes on light-speed trading, a law that the U.S. is considering as well.

5. OKCupid

Algorithms influence even our intimate relationships. The now-iconic surveys of OKCupid, the question-and-answer sessions the dating site spews out to help match its users, provide the data for the site’s compatibility algorithms. In order to calculate a match percentage between you and another person, the algorithm will factor in the results of the survey questions’ three aspects: what your answer is, what answer you’d like the other person to give, and how important the question is to you. In the computer program, those abstract values are assigned numbers, which are collated into a “match percentage.”

The company explains that if a person chooses the exact answer that you specify you want, they receive all of the matching points accorded to the level of importance you selected. So if you wanted a match to answer “How messy are you?” at the middle level of “Average,” and said that answer is “very important,” and the match chose that answer, the match would receive 50 out of 50 possible points. If they answered the question “Have you ever cheated in a relationship?” “Yes” but you specified a no answer at a very important level, they would receive zero out of 50 points.

As the question results mount up, those fractions are calculated into a final match percentage. For our hypothetical match, 50/50 plus 0/50 would amount to 50 out of 100 total points, or a miserable 50 percent compatibility rating. Ouch. No way an algorithm would go for that.

Algorithms might be pure math, but in all of these cases they are created and controlled by fallible human beings. These equations and data filters might be quietly influencing our lives, but that doesn’t mean we’re controlled by robot overlords: Imperfect humans create imperfect algorithms. In other words, you never know about that 50-percent match.

Kyle Chayka
Kyle Chayka is a freelance technology and culture writer living in Brooklyn. Follow him on Twitter @chaykak.

More From Kyle Chayka

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

December 20 • 10:28 AM

Flare-Ups

Are my emotions making me ill?


December 19 • 4:00 PM

How a Drug Policy Reform Organization Thinks of the Children

This valuable, newly updated resource for parents is based in the real world.


December 19 • 2:00 PM

Where Did the Ouija Board Come From?

It wasn’t just a toy.


December 19 • 12:00 PM

Social Scientists Can Do More to Eradicate Racial Oppression

Using our knowledge of social systems, all social scientists—black or white, race scholar or not—have an opportunity to challenge white privilege.


December 19 • 10:17 AM

How Scientists Contribute to Bad Science Reporting

By not taking university press officers and research press releases seriously, scientists are often complicit in the media falsehoods they so often deride.


December 19 • 10:00 AM

Pentecostalism in West Africa: A Boon or Barrier to Disease?

How has Ghana stayed Ebola-free despite being at high risk for infection? A look at their American-style Pentecostalism, a religion that threatens to do more harm than good.


December 19 • 8:00 AM

Don’t Text and Drive—Especially If You’re Old

A new study shows that texting while driving becomes even more dangerous with age.


December 19 • 6:12 AM

All That ‘Call of Duty’ With Your Friends Has Not Made You a More Violent Person

But all that solo Call of Duty has.


December 19 • 4:00 AM

Food for Thought: WIC Works

New research finds participation in the federal WIC program, which subsidizes healthy foods for young children, is linked with stronger cognitive development and higher test scores.


December 18 • 4:00 PM

How I Navigated Life as a Newly Sober Mom

Saying “no” to my kids was harder than saying “no” to alcohol. But for their sake and mine, I had to learn to put myself first sometimes.


December 18 • 2:00 PM

Women in Apocalyptic Fiction Shaving Their Armpits

Because our interest in realism apparently only goes so far.


December 18 • 12:00 PM

The Paradox of Choice, 10 Years Later

Paul Hiebert talks to psychologist Barry Schwartz about how modern trends—social media, FOMO, customer review sites—fit in with arguments he made a decade ago in his highly influential book, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less.


December 18 • 10:00 AM

What It’s Like to Spend a Few Hours in the Church of Scientology

Wrestling with thetans, attempting to unlock a memory bank, and a personality test seemingly aimed at people with depression. This is Scientology’s “dissemination drill” for potential new members.


December 18 • 8:00 AM

Gendering #BlackLivesMatter: A Feminist Perspective

Black men are stereotyped as violent, while black women are rendered invisible. Here’s why the gendering of black lives matters.


December 18 • 7:06 AM

Apparently You Can Bring Your Religion to Work

New research says offices that encourage talk of religion actually make for happier workplaces.


December 18 • 6:00 AM

The Very Weak and Complicated Links Between Mental Illness and Gun Violence

Vanderbilt University’s Jonathan Metzl and Kenneth MacLeish address our anxieties and correct our assumptions.


December 18 • 4:00 AM

Should Movies Be Rated RD for Reckless Driving?

A new study finds a link between watching films featuring reckless driving and engaging in similar behavior years later.


December 17 • 4:00 PM

How to Run a Drug Dealing Network in Prison

People tend not to hear about the prison drug dealing operations that succeed. Substance.com asks a veteran of the game to explain his system.


December 17 • 2:00 PM

Gender Segregation of Toys Is on the Rise

Charting the use of “toys for boys” and “toys for girls” in American English.


December 17 • 12:41 PM

Why the College Football Playoff Is Terrible But Better Than Before

The sample size is still embarrassingly small, but at least there’s less room for the availability cascade.


December 17 • 11:06 AM

Canadian Kids Have a Serious Smoking Problem

Bootleg cigarette sales could be leading Canadian teens to more serious drugs, a recent study finds.


December 17 • 10:37 AM

A Public Lynching in Sproul Plaza

When photographs of lynching victims showed up on a hallowed site of democracy in action, a provocation was issued—but to whom, by whom, and why?


December 17 • 8:00 AM

What Was the Job?

This was the year the job broke, the year we accepted a re-interpretation of its fundamental bargain and bought in to the push to get us to all work for ourselves rather than each other.


December 17 • 6:00 AM

White Kids Will Be Kids

Even the “good” kids—bound for college, upwardly mobile—sometimes break the law. The difference? They don’t have much to fear. A professor of race and social movements reflects on her teenage years and faces some uncomfortable realities.



Follow us


Don’t Text and Drive—Especially If You’re Old

A new study shows that texting while driving becomes even more dangerous with age.

Apparently You Can Bring Your Religion to Work

New research says offices that encourage talk of religion actually make for happier workplaces.

Canadian Kids Have a Serious Smoking Problem

Bootleg cigarette sales could be leading Canadian teens to more serious drugs, a recent study finds.

The Hidden Psychology of the Home Ref

That old myth of home field bias isn’t a myth at all; it’s a statistical fact.

The Big One

One in two United States senators and two in five House members who left office between 1998 and 2004 became lobbyists. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.