Menus Subscribe Search
babbage-engine

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

5 Hidden Algorithms That Rule Your World

• November 12, 2013 • 8:00 AM

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

From the NSA to OKCupid.

If the 1990s were dominated by the rise of the Internet and the 2000s social media behemoths, perhaps the ’10s are the decade of the algorithm. The word is a kind of cypher for whatever is happening in the world of technology at the moment. A brief survey of recent stories on the subject includes a bridge designed by algorithm, a traffic-reducing algorithm, and a match-making algorithm.

But what is an algorithm, exactly?

An algorithm is a method of processing information, a step-by-step procedure that turns a certain set of data into something else—perhaps a smaller, filtered set of data, an outcome that’s more useful than the original for the user of the algorithm. It’s a process-driven equation, one that’s difficult to define except in vague terms.

The word itself has ancient roots. Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, a mathematician in Baghdad in the 9th century, is known as the creator of algebra, which stems from the word al-jabr, meaning completion, in the context of an equation. In Latin translation, he became Algorismus, which was synonymous with the decimal number system, which the mathematician introduced to the Western world. Algorism was the practice of doing arithmetic with those digits.

Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

Algorithm’s modern usage came to the fore with the evolution of computers. Ada Lovelace was a British mathematician in the mid-19th century who worked with Charles Babbage’s analytical engines—the first computers—and is credited with creating the first computer program, an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers, critical to the number theory field of mathematics.

Lovelace imagined that computers might one day do much more than determine numbers, however important. If the “science of harmony” could be calculated, she once wrote, “the engine might compose elaborate and scientific pieces of music of any degree of complexity or extent.”

But she couldn’t have known the degree to which algorithms would metastasize and come to take over our lives in the 21st century. Below, I introduce five modern algorithms that we should all be aware of, since they alter our technological landscape in much more insidious ways than the Babbage Engine ever did.

1. The NSA’s Surveillance Algorithm

The NSA’s surveillance programs work, or so they claim, by collecting metadata: not the content of your phone calls and emails, but their length, who they connect you to, and when they happen. This mass of metadata is filtered by the agency’s algorithms, which trawl through the collection for triggers that give them reason for further investigation, AKA requisitioning the content of the communications. These triggers could be certain keywords—“offensive information warfare,” “illuminati,” and “computer terrorism” to name a few—or the identities of the people you’re contacting.

In one of the few concrete examples of successful metadata surveillance, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce stated in June that a phone number in San Diego was found to be making calls to the terrorist group al-Shabab in Somalia. The agency traced the number to one man, and further surveillance connected him to three others who were conspiring to send money to the terrorist group. All four were arrested in 2010 and convicted early this year.

Of course, now that details about the algorithm have spread, there’s a good chance it will be less effective. Vice recently launched an NSA spam generator that spits out sentences full of trigger words for would-be surveillance disruptors to insert into their email and confuse the system.

2. Encryption Algorithms

Another way to combat surveillance is to confuse the algorithms—turning their own capabilities against them. Encryption algorithms encode your data, using a secret formula to turn it into an unreadable mass that entities like the NSA can’t process. That’s how post-PRISM services like Silent Circle and Least Authority protect their users’ phone calls and messages from snooping. But encryption algorithms have a very long history.

According to the Roman historian Suetonius, Julius Caesar used the “Caesar cipher” to encode his private correspondence. The algorithm worked by shifting each letter of the alphabet back several places—for example, every D would become an A, every J would become a G, and so on. The message could only be unencrypted if the receiver knew what the shift was. This is a simplistic, easily-broken algorithm, but the German Enigma machine, which was used to encode military texts after World War I, took almost two decades to crack. These days, the NSA just goes straight to the source: It spies on Angela Merkel’s cell phone.

3. Google Search

If you’ve ever had Google fill in the rest of your search text like a mind-reader, you’ve also experienced an algorithm at work. Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

In fact, Google’s search algorithm, which is also referred to as PageRank, is one of the most powerful, secretive algorithms in the world of technology. In a visual explainer of how search works, Google notes that their algorithms “get to work looking for clues to better understand what you mean” by your search terms rather than just their literal content. They then use their formula to determine how relevant a certain page is to what you’re looking for, examining aspects like how often the site is updated and how well it’s connected to the rest of the Internet, putting the most useful links at the top of the search list.

Search-engine optimization (SEO) experts work to crack the code of this algorithm and get their clients’ sites to the top of the page. That’s a tough job, because the algorithm is always evolving, to the tune of 500 to 600 changes a year, to throw off cheaters and better serve searchers.

4. High-Frequency Trading Algorithms

In the heyday of Wall Street, traders shouted across exchange floors to buy and sell stocks. These days, it’s a whole lot quieter—around 50 percent of trading is done by firms specializing in “high-frequency trading” (HFT), which refers to rapid-fire share buys and sells carried out by computer programs rather than humans. Hedge funds that specialize in HFT develop proprietary algorithms to determine what they buy and sell and when, then the programs carry out those instructions in milli- or microseconds. These incredibly fast trades attempt to capitalize on volatile markets, buying before rises and selling before falls, however miniscule. The technology began its meteoric rise in the early ‘90s and became pervasive by 2010, but it’s not without its problems.

“Left unsupervised, algorithms can and will do strange things,” writes Christopher Steiner in his book Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World. In 2012, a “rogue algorithm” belonging to the New York firm Knight Capital glitched out and went on an ill-advised 45-minute trading spree that resulted in a loss of $440 million before it was quickly stopped, Steiner writes. The Flash Crash of 2010, in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1,000 points in a few minutes only to recover the value 20 minutes later, was exacerbated by high-frequency trading. When the algorithms noticed the downswing in the market, firms depending on the programs sold aggressively to protect their investors. In fact, the strategy might be on its way out—France and Italy have both instituted taxes on light-speed trading, a law that the U.S. is considering as well.

5. OKCupid

Algorithms influence even our intimate relationships. The now-iconic surveys of OKCupid, the question-and-answer sessions the dating site spews out to help match its users, provide the data for the site’s compatibility algorithms. In order to calculate a match percentage between you and another person, the algorithm will factor in the results of the survey questions’ three aspects: what your answer is, what answer you’d like the other person to give, and how important the question is to you. In the computer program, those abstract values are assigned numbers, which are collated into a “match percentage.”

The company explains that if a person chooses the exact answer that you specify you want, they receive all of the matching points accorded to the level of importance you selected. So if you wanted a match to answer “How messy are you?” at the middle level of “Average,” and said that answer is “very important,” and the match chose that answer, the match would receive 50 out of 50 possible points. If they answered the question “Have you ever cheated in a relationship?” “Yes” but you specified a no answer at a very important level, they would receive zero out of 50 points.

As the question results mount up, those fractions are calculated into a final match percentage. For our hypothetical match, 50/50 plus 0/50 would amount to 50 out of 100 total points, or a miserable 50 percent compatibility rating. Ouch. No way an algorithm would go for that.

Algorithms might be pure math, but in all of these cases they are created and controlled by fallible human beings. These equations and data filters might be quietly influencing our lives, but that doesn’t mean we’re controlled by robot overlords: Imperfect humans create imperfect algorithms. In other words, you never know about that 50-percent match.

Kyle Chayka
Kyle Chayka is a freelance technology and culture writer living in Brooklyn. Follow him on Twitter @chaykak.

More From Kyle Chayka

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

September 2 • 2:00 AM

Introducing the New Issue of ‘Pacific Standard’

The science of self-control, the rise of biblical counseling, why middle school doesn’t have to suck, and more in our September/October 2014 print issue.


September 1 • 1:00 PM

Television and Overeating: What We Watch Matters

New research finds fast-moving programming leads to mindless overeating.



September 1 • 6:00 AM

Why Someone Named Monty Iceman Sold Doogie Howser’s Estate

How unusual names, under certain circumstances, can lead to success.



August 29 • 4:00 PM

The Hidden Costs of Tobacco Debt

Even when taxpayers aren’t explicitly on the hook, tobacco bonds can cost states and local governments money. Here’s how.


August 29 • 2:00 PM

Why Don’t Men and Women Wear the Same Gender-Neutral Bathing Suits?

They used to in the 1920s.


August 29 • 11:48 AM

Your Brain Decides Whether to Trust Someone in Milliseconds

We can determine trustworthiness even when we’re only subliminally aware of the other person.


August 29 • 10:00 AM

True Darwinism Is All About Chance

Though the rich sometimes forget, Darwin knew that nature frequently rolls the dice.


August 29 • 8:00 AM

Why Our Molecular Make-Up Can’t Explain Who We Are

Our genes only tell a portion of the story.


August 29 • 6:00 AM

Strange Situations: Attachment Theory and Sexual Assault on College Campuses

When college women leave home, does attachment behavior make them more vulnerable to campus rape?


August 29 • 4:00 AM

Forgive Your Philandering Partner—and Pay the Price

New research finds people who forgive an unfaithful romantic partner are considered weaker and less competent than those who ended the relationship.


August 28 • 4:00 PM

Some Natural-Looking Zoo Exhibits May Be Even Worse Than the Old Concrete Ones

They’re often designed for you, the paying visitor, and not the animals who have to inhabit them.


August 28 • 2:00 PM

What I Learned From Debating Science With Trolls

“Don’t feed the trolls” is sound advice, but occasionally ignoring it can lead to rewards.


August 28 • 12:00 PM

The Ice Bucket Challenge’s Meme Money

The ALS Association has raised nearly $100 million over the past month, 50 times what it raised in the same period last year. How will that money be spent, and how can non-profit executives make a windfall last?


August 28 • 11:56 AM

Outlawing Water Conflict: California Legislators Confront Risky Groundwater Loophole

California, where ambitious agriculture sucks up 80 percent of the state’s developed water, is no stranger to water wrangles. Now one of the worst droughts in state history is pushing legislators to reckon with its unwieldy water laws, especially one major oversight: California has been the only Western state without groundwater regulation—but now that looks set to change.


August 28 • 11:38 AM

Young, Undocumented, and Invisible

While young migrant workers struggle under poor working conditions, U.S. policy has done little to help.


August 28 • 10:00 AM

The Five Words You Never Want to Hear From Your Doctor

“Sometimes people just get pains.”


August 28 • 8:00 AM

Why I’m Not Sharing My Coke

Andy Warhol, algorithms, and a bunch of popular names printed on soda cans.


August 28 • 6:00 AM

Can Outdoor Art Revitalize Outdoor Advertising?

That art you’ve been seeing at bus stations and billboards—it’s serving a purpose beyond just promoting local museums.


August 28 • 4:00 AM

Linguistic Analysis Reveals Research Fraud

An examination of papers by the discredited Diederik Stapel finds linguistic differences between his legitimate and fraudulent studies.


August 28 • 2:00 AM

Poverty and Geography: The Myth of Racial Segregation

Migration, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, or sexuality (not to mention class), can be a poverty-buster.


August 27 • 4:00 PM

The ‘Non-Lethal’ Flash-Bang Grenades Used in Ferguson Can Actually Be Quite Lethal

A journalist says he was singed by a flash-bang fired by St. Louis County police trying to disperse a crowd, raising questions about how to use these military-style devices safely and appropriately.


August 27 • 2:00 PM

Do Better Looking People Have Better Personalities Too?

An experiment on users of the dating site OKCupid found that members judge both looks and personality by looks alone.


August 27 • 12:00 PM

Love Can Make You Stronger

A new study links oxytocin, the hormone most commonly associated with social bonding, and the one that your body produces during an orgasm, with muscle regeneration.


Follow us


Subscribe Now

Your Brain Decides Whether to Trust Someone in Milliseconds

We can determine trustworthiness even when we’re only subliminally aware of the other person.

Young, Undocumented, and Invisible

While young migrant workers struggle under poor working conditions, U.S. policy has done little to help.

Education, Interrupted

When it comes to educational access, young Syrian refugees are becoming a “lost generation.”

No, Smartphone-Loss Anxiety Disorder Isn’t Real

But people are anxious about losing their phones, even if they don’t do much to protect them.

Being a Couch Potato: Not So Bad After All?

For those who feel guilty about watching TV, a new study provides redemption.

The Big One

One third of the United States federal budget for fighting wildfires goes toward one percent of such fires. September/October 2014 big-one-fires-final

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.