Menus Subscribe Search

Follow us


babbage-engine

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

5 Hidden Algorithms That Rule Your World

• November 12, 2013 • 8:00 AM

The Babbage Analytical Engine, for which the first algorithm was designed. (PHOTO: GENI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

From the NSA to OKCupid.

If the 1990s were dominated by the rise of the Internet and the 2000s social media behemoths, perhaps the ’10s are the decade of the algorithm. The word is a kind of cypher for whatever is happening in the world of technology at the moment. A brief survey of recent stories on the subject includes a bridge designed by algorithm, a traffic-reducing algorithm, and a match-making algorithm.

But what is an algorithm, exactly?

An algorithm is a method of processing information, a step-by-step procedure that turns a certain set of data into something else—perhaps a smaller, filtered set of data, an outcome that’s more useful than the original for the user of the algorithm. It’s a process-driven equation, one that’s difficult to define except in vague terms.

The word itself has ancient roots. Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, a mathematician in Baghdad in the 9th century, is known as the creator of algebra, which stems from the word al-jabr, meaning completion, in the context of an equation. In Latin translation, he became Algorismus, which was synonymous with the decimal number system, which the mathematician introduced to the Western world. Algorism was the practice of doing arithmetic with those digits.

Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

Algorithm’s modern usage came to the fore with the evolution of computers. Ada Lovelace was a British mathematician in the mid-19th century who worked with Charles Babbage’s analytical engines—the first computers—and is credited with creating the first computer program, an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers, critical to the number theory field of mathematics.

Lovelace imagined that computers might one day do much more than determine numbers, however important. If the “science of harmony” could be calculated, she once wrote, “the engine might compose elaborate and scientific pieces of music of any degree of complexity or extent.”

But she couldn’t have known the degree to which algorithms would metastasize and come to take over our lives in the 21st century. Below, I introduce five modern algorithms that we should all be aware of, since they alter our technological landscape in much more insidious ways than the Babbage Engine ever did.

1. The NSA’s Surveillance Algorithm

The NSA’s surveillance programs work, or so they claim, by collecting metadata: not the content of your phone calls and emails, but their length, who they connect you to, and when they happen. This mass of metadata is filtered by the agency’s algorithms, which trawl through the collection for triggers that give them reason for further investigation, AKA requisitioning the content of the communications. These triggers could be certain keywords—“offensive information warfare,” “illuminati,” and “computer terrorism” to name a few—or the identities of the people you’re contacting.

In one of the few concrete examples of successful metadata surveillance, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce stated in June that a phone number in San Diego was found to be making calls to the terrorist group al-Shabab in Somalia. The agency traced the number to one man, and further surveillance connected him to three others who were conspiring to send money to the terrorist group. All four were arrested in 2010 and convicted early this year.

Of course, now that details about the algorithm have spread, there’s a good chance it will be less effective. Vice recently launched an NSA spam generator that spits out sentences full of trigger words for would-be surveillance disruptors to insert into their email and confuse the system.

2. Encryption Algorithms

Another way to combat surveillance is to confuse the algorithms—turning their own capabilities against them. Encryption algorithms encode your data, using a secret formula to turn it into an unreadable mass that entities like the NSA can’t process. That’s how post-PRISM services like Silent Circle and Least Authority protect their users’ phone calls and messages from snooping. But encryption algorithms have a very long history.

According to the Roman historian Suetonius, Julius Caesar used the “Caesar cipher” to encode his private correspondence. The algorithm worked by shifting each letter of the alphabet back several places—for example, every D would become an A, every J would become a G, and so on. The message could only be unencrypted if the receiver knew what the shift was. This is a simplistic, easily-broken algorithm, but the German Enigma machine, which was used to encode military texts after World War I, took almost two decades to crack. These days, the NSA just goes straight to the source: It spies on Angela Merkel’s cell phone.

3. Google Search

If you’ve ever had Google fill in the rest of your search text like a mind-reader, you’ve also experienced an algorithm at work. Compounding what you’ve previously searched with what other users search for every day, Google’s algorithms can predict what you’re looking for with a frightening degree of accuracy.

In fact, Google’s search algorithm, which is also referred to as PageRank, is one of the most powerful, secretive algorithms in the world of technology. In a visual explainer of how search works, Google notes that their algorithms “get to work looking for clues to better understand what you mean” by your search terms rather than just their literal content. They then use their formula to determine how relevant a certain page is to what you’re looking for, examining aspects like how often the site is updated and how well it’s connected to the rest of the Internet, putting the most useful links at the top of the search list.

Search-engine optimization (SEO) experts work to crack the code of this algorithm and get their clients’ sites to the top of the page. That’s a tough job, because the algorithm is always evolving, to the tune of 500 to 600 changes a year, to throw off cheaters and better serve searchers.

4. High-Frequency Trading Algorithms

In the heyday of Wall Street, traders shouted across exchange floors to buy and sell stocks. These days, it’s a whole lot quieter—around 50 percent of trading is done by firms specializing in “high-frequency trading” (HFT), which refers to rapid-fire share buys and sells carried out by computer programs rather than humans. Hedge funds that specialize in HFT develop proprietary algorithms to determine what they buy and sell and when, then the programs carry out those instructions in milli- or microseconds. These incredibly fast trades attempt to capitalize on volatile markets, buying before rises and selling before falls, however miniscule. The technology began its meteoric rise in the early ‘90s and became pervasive by 2010, but it’s not without its problems.

“Left unsupervised, algorithms can and will do strange things,” writes Christopher Steiner in his book Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World. In 2012, a “rogue algorithm” belonging to the New York firm Knight Capital glitched out and went on an ill-advised 45-minute trading spree that resulted in a loss of $440 million before it was quickly stopped, Steiner writes. The Flash Crash of 2010, in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1,000 points in a few minutes only to recover the value 20 minutes later, was exacerbated by high-frequency trading. When the algorithms noticed the downswing in the market, firms depending on the programs sold aggressively to protect their investors. In fact, the strategy might be on its way out—France and Italy have both instituted taxes on light-speed trading, a law that the U.S. is considering as well.

5. OKCupid

Algorithms influence even our intimate relationships. The now-iconic surveys of OKCupid, the question-and-answer sessions the dating site spews out to help match its users, provide the data for the site’s compatibility algorithms. In order to calculate a match percentage between you and another person, the algorithm will factor in the results of the survey questions’ three aspects: what your answer is, what answer you’d like the other person to give, and how important the question is to you. In the computer program, those abstract values are assigned numbers, which are collated into a “match percentage.”

The company explains that if a person chooses the exact answer that you specify you want, they receive all of the matching points accorded to the level of importance you selected. So if you wanted a match to answer “How messy are you?” at the middle level of “Average,” and said that answer is “very important,” and the match chose that answer, the match would receive 50 out of 50 possible points. If they answered the question “Have you ever cheated in a relationship?” “Yes” but you specified a no answer at a very important level, they would receive zero out of 50 points.

As the question results mount up, those fractions are calculated into a final match percentage. For our hypothetical match, 50/50 plus 0/50 would amount to 50 out of 100 total points, or a miserable 50 percent compatibility rating. Ouch. No way an algorithm would go for that.

Algorithms might be pure math, but in all of these cases they are created and controlled by fallible human beings. These equations and data filters might be quietly influencing our lives, but that doesn’t mean we’re controlled by robot overlords: Imperfect humans create imperfect algorithms. In other words, you never know about that 50-percent match.

Kyle Chayka
Kyle Chayka is a freelance technology and culture writer living in Brooklyn. Follow him on Twitter @chaykak.

More From Kyle Chayka

A weekly roundup of the best of Pacific Standard and PSmag.com, delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Posts

October 31 • 10:15 AM

Levels of Depression Could Be Evaluated Through Measurements of Acoustic Speech

Engineers find tell-tale signs in speech patterns of the depressed.


October 31 • 8:00 AM

Who Wants a Cute Congressman?

You probably do—even if you won’t admit it. In politics, looks aren’t everything, but they’re definitely something.


October 31 • 7:00 AM

Why Scientists Make Promises They Can’t Keep

A research proposal that is totally upfront about the uncertainty of the scientific process and its potential benefits might never pass governmental muster.


October 31 • 6:12 AM

The Psychology of a Horror Movie Fan

Scientists have tried to figure out the appeal of axe murderers and creepy dolls, but it mostly remains a spooky mystery.


October 31 • 4:00 AM

The Power of Third Person Plural on Support for Public Policies

Researchers find citizens react differently to policy proposals when they’re framed as impacting “people,” as opposed to “you.”


October 30 • 4:00 PM

I Should Have Told My High School Students About My Struggle With Drinking

As a teacher, my students confided in me about many harrowing aspects of their lives. I never crossed the line and shared my biggest problem with them—but now I wish I had.


October 30 • 2:00 PM

How Dark Money Got a Mining Company Everything It Wanted

An accidentally released court filing reveals how one company secretly gave money to a non-profit that helped get favorable mining legislation passed.


October 30 • 12:00 PM

The Halloween Industrial Complex

The scariest thing about Halloween might be just how seriously we take it. For this week’s holiday, Americans of all ages will spend more than $5 billion on disposable costumes and bite-size candy.


October 30 • 10:00 AM

Sky’s the Limit: The Case for Selling Air Rights

Lower taxes and debt, increased revenue for the city, and a much better use of space in already dense environments: Selling air rights and encouraging upward growth seem like no-brainers, but NIMBY resistance and philosophical barriers remain.


October 30 • 9:00 AM

Cycles of Fear and Bias in the Criminal Justice System

Exploring the psychological roots of racial disparity in U.S. prisons.


October 30 • 8:00 AM

How Do You Make a Living, Email Newsletter Writer?

Noah Davis talks to Wait But Why writer Tim Urban about the newsletter concept, the research process, and escaping “money-flushing toilet” status.



October 30 • 6:00 AM

Dreamers of the Carbon-Free Dream

Can California go full-renewable?


October 30 • 5:08 AM

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it’s probably something we should work on.


October 30 • 4:00 AM

He’s Definitely a Liberal—Just Check Out His Brain Scan

New research finds political ideology can be easily determined by examining how one’s brain reacts to disgusting images.


October 29 • 4:00 PM

Should We Prosecute Climate Change Protesters Who Break the Law?

A conversation with Bristol County, Massachusetts, District Attorney Sam Sutter, who dropped steep charges against two climate change protesters.


October 29 • 2:23 PM

Innovation Geography: The Beginning of the End for Silicon Valley

Will a lack of affordable housing hinder the growth of creative start-ups?


October 29 • 2:00 PM

Trapped in the Tobacco Debt Trap

A refinance of Niagara County, New York’s tobacco bonds was good news—but for investors, not taxpayers.


October 29 • 12:00 PM

Purity and Self-Mutilation in Thailand

During the nine-day Phuket Vegetarian Festival, a group of chosen ones known as the mah song torture themselves in order to redirect bad luck and misfortune away from their communities and ensure a year of prosperity.


October 29 • 10:00 AM

Can Proposition 47 Solve California’s Problem With Mass Incarceration?

Reducing penalties for low-level felonies could be the next step in rolling back draconian sentencing laws and addressing the criminal justice system’s long legacy of racism.


October 29 • 9:00 AM

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.


October 29 • 8:00 AM

America’s Bathrooms Are a Total Failure

No matter which American bathroom is crowned in this year’s America’s Best Restroom contest, it will still have a host of terrible flaws.



October 29 • 6:00 AM

Tell Us What You Really Think

In politics, are we always just looking out for No. 1?


October 29 • 4:00 AM

Racial Resentment Drives Tea Party Membership

New research finds a strong link between tea party membership and anti-black feelings.


Follow us


Levels of Depression Could Be Evaluated Through Measurements of Acoustic Speech

Engineers find tell-tale signs in speech patterns of the depressed.

We’re Not So Great at Rejecting Each Other

And it's probably something we should work on.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Brain

Neuroscientists find less—but potentially stronger—white matter in the brains of patients with CFS.

Incumbents, Pray for Rain

Come next Tuesday, rain could push voters toward safer, more predictable candidates.

Could Economics Benefit From Computer Science Thinking?

Computational complexity could offer new insight into old ideas in biology and, yes, even the dismal science.

The Big One

One town, Champlain, New York, was the source of nearly half the scams targeting small businesses in the United States last year. November/December 2014

Copyright © 2014 by Pacific Standard and The Miller-McCune Center for Research, Media, and Public Policy. All Rights Reserved.