Pacific Standard March-April 2013 Cover

Gay Men on Campus: Smart, Studious, Involved

An economist taking a new look at existing data suggests that gay men do incrementally better at college than straight men, while bisexual women do worse than their peers.


Economist says data suggests that gay men do incrementally better at college than straight men, while lesbian and bisexual women do worse than their straight female peers. (Faakhir Rizvi)
4 Flares 4 Flares ×

Gay male college students are more motivated to learn and more likely to be mentored than their straight counterparts, and their above-average grades suggest this kind of engagement makes a real difference.

Those are some of the findings of an intriguing new look at sexual minorities on American college campuses, which has just been published in the journal Economics of Education Review. According to the research, which is apparently the first of its kind, gay male undergraduates appear to be doing quite well: Their grade point average is about 2 percent higher than that of straight males at the same institution.

“The thing that really comes out (in the data) is that gay men see academic work as more important than heterosexual men,” said study author Christopher Carpenter, an assistant professor of economics and public policy at the University of California, Irvine. “They were 1.41 times more likely to say their academic work was important.

“That could explain the GPA effect,” he added. “It’s plausible that if gay men perceive their academic work as more important, then they’re trying harder.”

Gay men also spend 40 to 50 percent more time doing volunteer work or participating in student organizations, according to Carpenter’s findings. “It’s possible that these organizations they belong to could include fraternities,” he said. “But I doubt that, because gay men were less likely to say participating in parties was important to them.”

Another possible factor in their success rate: Gay male students were about 13 percent more likely than straight male students to report they had a faculty member or administrator they could talk to about a problem.

For women, the picture is far more mixed. “Like gay men, lesbians and bisexual women were much more likely to find politics and the arts important,” Carpenter said. “The (above-average levels of) connectedness and activism were the same for lesbians and gay men.

“But the other findings were definitely different. Those differences were driven almost entirely by those women who have had both male and female sex partners. Behavioral lesbians appear to do no worse, no better academically than behavioral heterosexuals.

“But behavioral bisexuals (who are overwhelmingly female) do a lot worse. They spend significantly less time studying. They’re much less satisfied with their academic work. They think their academic work is less important than do other women. Bisexual women are not having as good a college experience.”

The study provides interesting context for previous findings that homosexuals in the U.S. are far more likely to be college educated than heterosexuals. A 2004 New Jersey study found 52 percent of same-sex couples in that state include at least one partner with a college degree, compared to 42 percent of opposite-sex couples.

Carpenter obtained his data from the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study, one of the few surveys to include questions about students’ sexuality. “In 1997, 1999 and 2001, they did a nationally representative survey of alcohol use on college campuses,” he said. “They had high-quality data from 120 colleges and universities, with thousands of students responding. That’s the data subset I used. (Among a wide range of questions) they asked if you have had sex, and if so, was it with males exclusively, females exclusively, or both.”

The 2001 survey, using those criteria, found that 4.7 percent of male students and 6.2 percent of females were gay, lesbian or bisexual.

Carpenter is quick to concede that reporting on amorous experiences at that stage in life is far from a definitive statement about sexual orientation. For women in particular, having a same-sex partner in college is not necessarily an indication of one’s adult sexuality, and he cautioned about drawing conclusions based on these responses.
“Female sexuality appears to be far more complicated than male sexuality,” he said.

Nevertheless, he was thrilled to stumble across this data, since – apparently due to privacy concerns – there are surprisingly few surveys that ask students about their sexual orientation. He hopes more such surveys will be taken in the future and they will break down what specific organizations these students belong to.

Such information would be “really relevant when considering college and university resource allocations,” he noted. “If (as the increased level of mentorship suggests) we found the positive effects for gay men were driven by access to gay/lesbian/bisexual resource centers, that might mean you should invest more in those centers.”

Or, at the very least, make sure they survive in an era of cutbacks.

“Clearly, gay/lesbian resource centers have become more prominent on campuses over the past couple of decades,” Carpenter noted. “We could be observing that effect. They may increase the connectedness of sexual minority students.”

Carpenter’s findings reinforce several stereotypes: Lesbians are more likely to be involved in athletics than straight women, and gays, lesbians and bisexuals all express more interest in the arts than straight students. Participation in cultural activities is particularly important to gay men, which raises the question of a possible connection between creative expression and academic achievement. Numerous studies have suggested that exposure to the arts, particularly music, helps cognitive development in children; perhaps its impact extends all the way into college.

Interest in the arts may also help explain a puzzling disconnect between gay men’s college achievements and later incomes.
“In a California study, I found no difference in earnings between self-identified gay men and straight men,” Carpenter said. “But there are other studies that find gay men earn a lot less. I don’t think the jury is in yet.

“I find gay men place a lot more importance in the arts. Arts occupations are not well paid, and gay men are disproportionately likely to be employed in those professions.”

In other words, when it comes to income, your GPA may be less important than whether you earn an MBA or an MFA.

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

About Tom Jacobs

Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Ventura County Star.

  • Chris Gerlica

    I would just like to inform of how offensive one of the quotes in this article is.The section: “Gay men also spend 40 to 50 percent more time doing volunteer work or participating in student organizations, according to Carpenter’s findings. “It’s possible that these organizations they belong to could include fraternities,” he said. “But I doubt that, because gay men were less likely to say participating in parties was important to them.”"This section is very stereotypical and ignorant to the Greek community. I say this as a gay man who joined a Fraternity(later even becoming my chapter’s president). Greek life is not all about parties, but our main goals center around academic achievement and helping our communities. I am very disappointed that Christopher Carter knows nothing about Greek life past the movie Animal House, and that there is no counter-point to this statement within the article.

  • Paul Brownsey

    The article doesn’t mention what, on the basis of my own experience, would appear to be a very plausible explanation of why gay students do better academically, namely, that if you’re gay and anxious about being taunted for not going out with people of the other gender, then being an academic type who ‘doesn’t have time for all that’ is a good refuge. This may kick in at pre-college level and carry over to college. I remember the relief at overhearing a relative say, “Paul hasn’t got time for girls – he has all this studying to do,” and realised (since at that point I wasn’t ready to start looking for a gay relationship) I had the perfect excuse.

  • Anonymous User

    In the book, “The Velvet Rage” it proposes that gay men are more motivated to do better in life (education, work achievements, etc.) because of a desire to prove to the world, their self-worth and/or value. I can see how his hypothesis rings true through this research data. I highly doubt that it has anything to do with Brownsey’s conclusion in general. Remember, we are talking about college, not high school. At my undergraduate insitution, the gay men and lesbians virtually ran the campus through all the leaderships positions, in Student Government, University Housing, and the Office of Leadership and Volunteer Services.

  • Anonymous User

    I’ve taught biology to thousands of pre-med and pre-pharm college freshmen in the past five years, and, being an older woman, I didn’t know the first thing about gays when I started (they didn’t exist when I was young —- or so it seemed). Over the years, I have become intrigued by a totally unexpected observation. It appears to me there is simply a disproportionately high percentage of unusually bright and creative people in the gay population. Some of them may work harder than average, that’s true, but it’s more than that. I’ve seen more just plain raw potential in this group. Now, it’s possible that I notice it more because I do think they are more likely to establish mentor-mentee relationships with me. That’s a good thing, and it occurs because they are uncommonly strong communicators. The comment about sexual favors made in this article is highly insulting and completely wrong. These students are jewels, pure and simple, and the suffering our society imposes on them is criminal.

  • Anonymous User

    My apologies to the author for my previous posting. Apparently the comment I objected to was made in a lead-in article, not by this author.

  • Anonymous User

    This article makes me feel so good about myself? I’m gay and i’m going to college next year and i’m gonna be able to come out. Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.Anyway, i think that oppression of the gay community has caused us to be more mature more aware and more creative. It sucks to be homophobic.

  • Anonymous User

    I’m the same college instructor who posted below, and I have a few points I’d like to bring up for discussion.There could be some truth to the idea that gays study more to hide the fact that they’re not dating girls. However, my impression is that many gays wish very much to have a long-term, nurturing, meaningful relationship of the type that heterosexuals are encouraged to have. Our society makes it as hard as possible for them to establish or maintain such relationships. My guess is that the conflicts and heartache that ensue waste quite a bit of the time and emotional energy of gays, as does the time they spend dealing with issues of denial and secrecy. Thus, I don’t think their sexuality puts them at a net competitive advantage for excelling scholastically.There could also be some truth to idea that gays are more creative because they have suffered more. However, I believe the sad truth is that many gays are broken by their suffering. They resort to alcohol, drugs, and promiscuity because society tries to deny them the love and acceptance that everyone craves. Society tries to force them to live a life that is a lie, and society tries to consider their very essence to be inferior. I think we should be careful not to give the impression that discrimination against gays is positive in any way.I think it is true that gays are more interested in public service. Although it’s conceivable that they engage in public service to meet gays, as I’ve seen suggested, the looking-for-dates scenario would seem just as applicable to heterosexuals. I wouldn’t expect that to be the primary reason that gays are more active in social movements. Their own suffering is a possible contributor, but I don’t think that other minority groups that have suffered have tended to become disproportionately involved in movements other than their own.There seems little doubt that gays are more likely to be interested in the arts than heterosexuals. We could argue that this is because they have suffered or that it is to hide the fact that they’re not dating females. However, my discussions with gays suggest they were more interested in the arts from their earliest memories. This leads me to suspect that it is not a difference that they have adopted to cope with their homosexuality but rather is an inborn aspect of their natures.In short, I think there are real, innate differences in gays that would be interesting to study. Of course there are crude, stupid gays just as there are such individuals in any group, and those individuals probably don’t come to my attention. I tend to notice the outstanding members of my class, and what I notice is that a strikingly large number of them are gay. I suspect that ON AVERAGE, gays tend to be more sensitive, creative, and intellectually gifted in large part simply because they were born that way. Gays don’t wear self-identifiers, so despite my interaction with very large numbers of students, I can’t evaluate this trend as well as I would like. It has just jumped out at me. I’m surprised that more research hasn’t been done on the topic, although it’s probably politically charged. If anyone knows of any such research or has any comments to make, I’d be very interested.

  • Pingback: Black + Male + Educated = Gay « The Soleblog