Pacific Standard May-June 2013 Cover

Admire Her Body, Hamper Her Brain?

New research suggests sexual objectification hinders some women’s cognitive ability.


Researchers suggest that the cumulative effects of objectification on the female body over a lifetime may severely disrupt a woman's cognitive processes. (Gabriella Fabbri)
2 Flares 2 Flares ×

Guys, here’s something to consider the next time you ogle an attractive woman: Your desirous gaze may be reducing her capacity to think.

That’s the startling implication of a research paper titled “My Body or My Mind,” recently published in the European Journal of Social Psychology. It suggests some women who are objectified by men internalize this perception and think of themselves as “a sexual object to be scrutinized.” For reasons that are not entirely clear, this process appears to undermine their cognitive ability.

Psychologists Robin Gay and Emanuele Castano of the New School for Social Research tested this thesis with a clever experiment that mimics and magnifies what many women experience in everyday life. The study participants — 25 women ages 18 to 35 — were told they were recruited to provide information on “the impressions people form about others solely based on their carriage and style of dress.”

Each was videotaped for two minutes — first from the front, then from behind — while they walked up and down a hall. To capture the experience of having their bodies evaluated while their faces (which presumably provide a better reflection of their individual personalities) were ignored, they were filmed exclusively from the neck down.

For half the participants, the person doing the filming was male; for the other half, the camera was held by a woman. “Although there is no doubt that women tend to objectify other women, the sexually objectifying gaze is more likely to come from a man,” the researchers write.

After the filming, each woman watched her video, reinforcing the experience in her mind. She then filled out questionnaires measuring her levels of Trait Self-Objectification (her overall propensity to view herself through the lens of others) and State Self-Objectification (her tendency to view herself through the lens of others when triggered by a specific event, such as being stared at).

To test their cognitive skills, the women were shown a series of random letters or numbers and instructed to reorder them (putting them in alphabetical order for the letters, in ascending order for the numbers). They completed 21 such tasks, which were presented in increasing order of difficulty.

The results: When women with a tendency toward viewing themselves through the lens of others were placed in a situation where they were objectified (that is, they were videotaped by a man), they made a greater number of mistakes on the cognitive test. They did just as well as other women on the easy initial tasks, but had trouble when the difficulty level went up.

After a follow-up study found anxiety and self-esteem levels were not a factor, the researchers concluded their cognitive difficulties “might be due to a split in perspective regarding the self.” (This notion was first described in a 1997 paper by Barbara Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts.)

A woman in this situation simultaneously sees herself as a unique individual and a generic sexual being. Dividing the psyche in this uncomfortable way “is likely to increase cognitive load, with a resulting decrease in the availability of cognitive resources for the tasks the individual engages in,” Gay and Castano write.

They suggest further research would be valuable to discover why some women are prone to self-objectification, while others seem protected against it. Gay and Castano’s data suggest about 20 percent of women have a strong propensity toward self-objectification and are thus particularly susceptible to triggers, such as being stared at.

The researchers propose a campaign of awareness and education regarding this phenomenon, which could help women “begin to gain control over, or at least buffer themselves against” its negative cognitive impact. They conclude “it stands to reason that the cumulative effects of objectification on the female body over a lifetime may severely disrupt cognitive processes,” at least among this sizable slice of the population.

This is your brain on wolf whistles.

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

About Tom Jacobs

Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Ventura County Star.

  • Anonymous

    Does this mean that people who constantly try to see themselves (and their actions and comments) from the point of view of others are also at risk of decreased cognitive development? Would it be reasonable to say that people who are sympathetic to their surroundings suffer from divided focus and lack abilities at higher levels of difficulty?

  • jas

    “For half the participants, the person doing the filming was male; for the other half, the camera was held by a woman…”

    Exactly how did the experimenters divide 25 people evenly?

  • Anonymous

    Not to be mean, but this study did not, in fact, have any control over the ‘objectification’. It, instead, showed that women were more uncomfortable being looked at by men, than by women, when all other factors are the same. In other words, that women are all sexist. I don’t think that…I’m just saying that the study does not AT ALL support the conclusion they’re reaching. Just sayin.

  • Anonymous

    Well some years ago it was showed that men don’t remember well around pretty women. My hypotheses is that it is probably something that support the propagation of the species.

  • Ashley

    I think you critics should try reading the actual scientific journal article to find out the details before you start picking apart the experiment for methodological flaws. Something tells me that The New School for Social Research have a clue when it comes to research…just sayin’.

  • PDO

    At the risk of sounding like I’m saying “They were asking for it”, it seems strange that this “dumb bimbo” effect is felt by women who work so hard to appear attractive and sexually alluring. Maybe they need to ask themselves who they want to be: Miss Hathaway or Miss America.

  • IslamIsTheTruth

    Mashaallah, every year we discover something new that brings me closer and closer to Islam. Allah knows how we are, he’s the creator. That is why Allah commanded the women to cover up. It’s not only on modesty but also effecting the people around her.

  • rjc116

    Seems like an empirical version of the quote by Eleanor Roosevelt who said,
    “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.”

    I also wonder if those people who are extraordinarily good looking would test out having superior cognitive results based on the approval and attention they receive?

  • AMT

    This study merely shows that women who have recently been sexually objectified by a man are distracted by it afterward. I’m not so sure this is something to sound the alarm bells over.

    The distraction *might* be the result of “a split in perspective regarding the self”… but it could also be that the women were thinking about the man objectifying them, or thinking about sex, or thinking about a thousand other things that might be triggered in a way that is correlated with “self-objectification.” There is no evidence from this experiment that the women’s cognitive load is impaired specifically because of an uncomfortably divided perspective regarding the self. Perhaps the highly “self-objectifying” women are merely more aware of how they seem to others, which could be a useful, pro-social trait in other circumstances.

    The authors then take a wild leap on the basis of their poorly supported conclusions when they write, “it stands to reason that the cumulative effects of objectification on the female body over a lifetime may severely disrupt cognitive processes.” What cumulative effects? They tested 25 women exactly once. There is no reason to think that they would get progressively worse at the task the more they were objectified, and there is no reason to think that their cognitive impairment lasts more than the short time it took them to complete the test. In that quote, which of course gets more attention than anything else in the article, the authors make it sound like objectification is some dread poison slowly corroding the brains of young women… when all they’ve shown is that it distracts them for a short time.

    I hope we’ll hold off on the proposed awareness campaign until these claims are objectively tested.

  • misantranthropope

    well that's only fair, considering the effect an ogle-worthy woman has on MY brain. my only real selling point is witty repartee, and that goes RIGHT out the window.